PRDMX vs. NEEGX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Diversified Mid Cap Growth Fund (PRDMX) and Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX).
PRDMX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Dec 31, 2003. NEEGX is managed by Needham. It was launched on Jan 2, 1996.
Performance
PRDMX vs. NEEGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRDMX vs. NEEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRDMX T. Rowe Price Diversified Mid Cap Growth Fund | -9.37% | 19.47% | 23.77% | 20.75% | -24.65% | 13.56% | 31.82% | 37.91% | -3.15% | 24.66% |
NEEGX Needham Growth Fund | 10.46% | 8.76% | 14.45% | 26.85% | -33.57% | 27.63% | 41.73% | 42.33% | -10.56% | 8.33% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRDMX achieves a -9.37% return, which is significantly lower than NEEGX's 10.46% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PRDMX having a 12.52% annualized return and NEEGX not far behind at 12.22%.
PRDMX
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -9.93%
- YTD
- -9.37%
- 6M
- -4.92%
- 1Y
- 16.61%
- 3Y*
- 14.54%
- 5Y*
- 6.81%
- 10Y*
- 12.52%
NEEGX
- 1D
- -3.44%
- 1M
- -10.09%
- YTD
- 10.46%
- 6M
- 15.76%
- 1Y
- 43.28%
- 3Y*
- 16.99%
- 5Y*
- 6.62%
- 10Y*
- 12.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRDMX vs. NEEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRDMX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than NEEGX's 1.78% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRDMX vs. NEEGX — Risk / Return Rank
PRDMX
NEEGX
PRDMX vs. NEEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Diversified Mid Cap Growth Fund (PRDMX) and Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRDMX | NEEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.69 | 1.34 | -0.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.17 | 1.91 | -0.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.26 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | 2.57 | -1.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.79 | 8.49 | -4.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRDMX | NEEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 | 1.34 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.24 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.49 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.54 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRDMX and NEEGX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PRDMX vs. NEEGX - Dividend Comparison
PRDMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.09%, more than NEEGX's 6.85% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRDMX T. Rowe Price Diversified Mid Cap Growth Fund | 17.09% | 15.49% | 8.59% | 6.83% | 1.22% | 10.13% | 4.80% | 2.02% | 5.23% | 3.71% | 1.23% | 3.78% |
NEEGX Needham Growth Fund | 6.85% | 7.57% | 3.92% | 0.00% | 1.78% | 6.92% | 5.73% | 11.31% | 17.79% | 9.70% | 4.22% | 6.74% |
Drawdowns
PRDMX vs. NEEGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRDMX drawdown since its inception was -57.57%, which is greater than NEEGX's maximum drawdown of -53.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRDMX and NEEGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRDMX | NEEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.57% | -53.60% | -3.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.31% | -15.15% | +1.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.69% | -43.35% | +7.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.91% | -43.35% | +7.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.73% | -11.71% | -1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.44% | -10.95% | +2.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.70% | 4.59% | -0.89% |
Volatility
PRDMX vs. NEEGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Diversified Mid Cap Growth Fund (PRDMX) is 5.96%, while Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX) has a volatility of 10.19%. This indicates that PRDMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRDMX | NEEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.96% | 10.19% | -4.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.07% | 20.43% | -5.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.07% | 31.97% | -7.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.09% | 27.98% | -5.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.43% | 24.97% | -3.54% |