PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRDGX vs. FSENX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRDGX vs. FSENX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX) and Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRDGX achieves a 10.76% return, which is significantly lower than FSENX's 39.98% return. Over the past 10 years, PRDGX has outperformed FSENX with an annualized return of 12.88%, while FSENX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.34% annualized return.


PRDGX

1D
-0.43%
1M
0.31%
6M
8.04%
YTD
10.76%
1Y
19.11%
3Y*
14.42%
5Y*
9.85%
10Y*
12.88%
ALL TIME*
10.50%

FSENX

1D
0.82%
1M
11.49%
6M
23.93%
YTD
39.98%
1Y
50.48%
3Y*
16.38%
5Y*
25.73%
10Y*
10.34%
ALL TIME*
8.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PRDGX vs. FSENX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRDGX
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc.
10.76%14.74%13.48%13.68%-10.22%26.03%13.92%31.76%-1.06%18.89%
FSENX
Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio
39.98%10.56%4.26%0.94%62.98%55.31%-32.51%9.90%-24.94%-2.65%

Correlation

The correlation between PRDGX and FSENX is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1992

0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between PRDGX and FSENX has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRDGX vs. FSENX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRDGX
PRDGX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PRDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
PRDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

FSENX
FSENX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FSENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSENX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FSENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSENX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRDGX vs. FSENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX) and Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRDGXFSENXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.38

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

3.92

-1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.26

10.81

-0.55

PRDGX vs. FSENX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRDGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the FSENX Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRDGX and FSENX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRDGX vs. FSENX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRDGX drawdown since its inception was -49.79%, smaller than the maximum FSENX drawdown of -76.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRDGX and FSENX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRDGXFSENXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.79%

-76.24%

+26.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-12.22%

+4.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.15%

-25.85%

+11.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.31%

-28.02%

+8.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.18%

-72.11%

+38.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.96%

-1.61%

+0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.39%

-16.98%

+11.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

4.47%

-2.71%

Volatility

PRDGX vs. FSENX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX) is 2.45%, while Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX) has a volatility of 5.74%. This indicates that PRDGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRDGXFSENXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.45%

5.74%

-3.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.44%

15.83%

-8.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.88%

20.13%

-10.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.03%

27.00%

-12.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.82%

30.81%

-14.99%

PRDGX vs. FSENX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRDGX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than FSENX's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRDGX vs. FSENX - Dividend Comparison

PRDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.31%, more than FSENX's 1.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSENX
Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio
1.53%1.95%1.95%1.98%2.50%2.25%3.43%1.84%1.48%1.74%0.62%1.29%
PRDGX
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc.
7.31%8.02%4.66%2.78%3.81%2.00%1.03%2.33%3.67%1.82%3.07%7.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRDGX and FSENX have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSENX has higher volatility (5.74%) compared to PRDGX (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRDGX dropped -49.79% vs FSENX's -76.24%.

FSENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRDGX and FSENX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer