PRDGX vs. FLCPX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX).
PRDGX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Dec 30, 1992. FLCPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 2, 2016.
Performance
PRDGX vs. FLCPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRDGX vs. FLCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRDGX T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. | -2.47% | 14.74% | 13.48% | 13.68% | -10.22% | 26.03% | 13.92% | 31.76% | -1.06% | 18.89% |
FLCPX Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund | -7.05% | 17.84% | 25.08% | 26.25% | -18.06% | 28.61% | 18.24% | 31.59% | -4.38% | 21.74% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRDGX achieves a -2.47% return, which is significantly higher than FLCPX's -7.05% return. Over the past 10 years, PRDGX has underperformed FLCPX with an annualized return of 12.09%, while FLCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.75% annualized return.
PRDGX
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -7.31%
- YTD
- -2.47%
- 6M
- -0.01%
- 1Y
- 9.42%
- 3Y*
- 12.29%
- 5Y*
- 9.25%
- 10Y*
- 12.09%
FLCPX
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -7.70%
- YTD
- -7.05%
- 6M
- -4.58%
- 1Y
- 14.45%
- 3Y*
- 17.20%
- 5Y*
- 11.42%
- 10Y*
- 13.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRDGX vs. FLCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRDGX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCPX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRDGX vs. FLCPX — Risk / Return Rank
PRDGX
FLCPX
PRDGX vs. FLCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRDGX | FLCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.71 | 0.84 | -0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.08 | 1.30 | -0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.20 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 1.00 | -0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.83 | 4.86 | -1.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRDGX | FLCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 0.84 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.67 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.82 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRDGX and FLCPX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PRDGX vs. FLCPX - Dividend Comparison
PRDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.30%, more than FLCPX's 0.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRDGX T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. | 8.30% | 8.02% | 4.66% | 2.78% | 3.81% | 2.00% | 1.03% | 2.33% | 3.67% | 1.82% | 3.07% | 7.57% |
FLCPX Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund | 0.60% | 0.56% | 6.11% | 7.05% | 11.23% | 10.38% | 3.93% | 1.74% | 2.18% | 1.57% | 0.76% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PRDGX vs. FLCPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRDGX drawdown since its inception was -49.79%, which is greater than FLCPX's maximum drawdown of -33.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRDGX and FLCPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRDGX | FLCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.79% | -33.87% | -15.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.28% | -12.14% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.31% | -24.40% | +5.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.18% | -33.87% | +0.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.32% | -8.89% | +1.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -4.24% | -1.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 2.56% | -0.22% |
Volatility
PRDGX vs. FLCPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX) is 3.43%, while Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX) has a volatility of 4.24%. This indicates that PRDGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRDGX | FLCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.43% | 4.24% | -0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.35% | 9.09% | -1.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.00% | 18.14% | -3.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.05% | 17.03% | -2.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.86% | 18.12% | -2.26% |