PRCPX vs. TRBCX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX).
PRCPX is a passively managed fund by T. Rowe Price that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US High-Yield 2% Issuer Capped Bond Index. It was launched on Apr 29, 2014. TRBCX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jun 30, 1993.
Performance
PRCPX vs. TRBCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRCPX vs. TRBCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRCPX T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund | -0.13% | 14.80% | 7.46% | 14.90% | -10.50% | 6.36% | 5.55% | 13.77% | -1.44% | 6.80% |
TRBCX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund | -14.57% | 18.78% | 48.46% | 49.42% | -38.57% | 17.54% | 34.73% | 29.97% | 2.00% | 36.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRCPX achieves a -0.13% return, which is significantly higher than TRBCX's -14.57% return. Over the past 10 years, PRCPX has underperformed TRBCX with an annualized return of 6.83%, while TRBCX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.42% annualized return.
PRCPX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 3.02%
- 1Y
- 13.68%
- 3Y*
- 10.60%
- 5Y*
- 5.87%
- 10Y*
- 6.83%
TRBCX
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -8.85%
- YTD
- -14.57%
- 6M
- -12.81%
- 1Y
- 11.69%
- 3Y*
- 24.58%
- 5Y*
- 10.10%
- 10Y*
- 15.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRCPX vs. TRBCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRCPX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than TRBCX's 0.69% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRCPX vs. TRBCX — Risk / Return Rank
PRCPX
TRBCX
PRCPX vs. TRBCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRCPX | TRBCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.47 | 0.51 | +2.96 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.52 | 0.89 | +4.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.93 | 1.13 | +0.80 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.53 | 0.49 | +4.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.08 | 1.72 | +19.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRCPX | TRBCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.47 | 0.51 | +2.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.23 | 0.42 | +0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.26 | 0.68 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.57 | +0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRCPX and TRBCX is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PRCPX vs. TRBCX - Dividend Comparison
PRCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.89%, more than TRBCX's 6.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRCPX T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund | 12.89% | 12.19% | 7.03% | 7.88% | 4.89% | 5.11% | 5.36% | 5.18% | 5.72% | 4.95% | 5.88% | 7.58% |
TRBCX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund | 6.14% | 5.25% | 18.16% | 3.49% | 5.87% | 9.38% | 1.19% | 0.36% | 2.44% | 2.94% | 0.67% | 3.26% |
Drawdowns
PRCPX vs. TRBCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRCPX drawdown since its inception was -23.07%, smaller than the maximum TRBCX drawdown of -54.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRCPX and TRBCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRCPX | TRBCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.07% | -54.56% | +31.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.03% | -17.01% | +13.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.34% | -43.63% | +29.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.07% | -43.63% | +20.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.74% | -17.01% | +15.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.16% | -11.35% | +8.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.65% | 4.86% | -4.21% |
Volatility
PRCPX vs. TRBCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX) is 1.10%, while T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX) has a volatility of 5.58%. This indicates that PRCPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRBCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRCPX | TRBCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.10% | 5.58% | -4.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.52% | 13.15% | -10.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.11% | 23.22% | -19.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.79% | 24.00% | -19.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.45% | 22.73% | -17.28% |