PRCOX vs. GLDM

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

PRCOX (T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Fund) and GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) are both funds - PRCOX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. PRCOX is actively managed, while GLDM is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PRCOX returned 13.80%/yr vs 17.41%/yr for GLDM. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PRCOX charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLDM.

Performance

PRCOX vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Fund (PRCOX) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRCOX achieves a 8.95% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's -2.40% return.

PRCOX

• 1D: 1.88%
• 1M: -0.25%
• YTD: 8.95%
• 6M: 9.41%
• 1Y: 24.86%
• 3Y*: 21.59%
• 5Y*: 13.80%
• 10Y*: 15.99%

GLDM

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -7.40%
• YTD: -2.40%
• 6M: -2.09%
• 1Y: 22.58%
• 3Y*: 29.27%
• 5Y*: 17.41%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRCOX vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PRCOX T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Fund	8.95%	16.34%	26.41%	29.82%	-18.80%	28.06%	19.82%	33.04%	-7.74%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	-2.40%	64.20%	27.08%	13.04%	-0.47%	-4.01%	25.10%	18.10%	1.75%

Correlation

The correlation between PRCOX and GLDM is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2018	0.08

The correlation between PRCOX and GLDM shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PRCOX vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRCOX

PRCOX Risk / Return Rank: 70
PRCOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
PRCOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
PRCOX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
PRCOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
PRCOX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

GLDM

GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 27
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 31
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRCOX vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Fund (PRCOX) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PRCOX	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	0.90	+1.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	1.26	+1.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.19	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.59	1.00	+1.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.74	2.87	+8.87

PRCOX vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRCOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRCOX and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PRCOX vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRCOX drawdown since its inception was -53.96%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -24.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRCOX and GLDM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRCOX	GLDM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.96%	-24.35%	-29.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.32%	-24.35%	+15.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.39%	-24.35%	+4.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.94%	-24.35%	-0.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.79%	-21.96%	+19.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.17%	-6.27%	-2.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	8.44%	-6.40%

Volatility

PRCOX vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Fund (PRCOX) is 4.69%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 7.73%. This indicates that PRCOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRCOX	GLDM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.69%	7.73%	-3.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.17%	23.93%	-13.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.51%	27.15%	-14.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.42%	18.13%	-0.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.39%	16.98%	+1.41%

PRCOX vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRCOX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRCOX vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

PRCOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PRCOX T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Fund	1.08%	1.17%	0.64%	1.17%	1.28%	3.71%	1.04%	1.39%	5.60%	7.02%	7.28%	8.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRCOX and GLDM in my portfolio?

PRCOX and GLDM have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PRCOX or GLDM?

GLDM has higher volatility (7.73%) compared to PRCOX (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRCOX dropped -53.96% vs GLDM's -24.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRCOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.