PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRCOX vs. FSPCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRCOX vs. FSPCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Fund (PRCOX) and Fidelity Select Insurance Portfolio (FSPCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRCOX achieves a 12.08% return, which is significantly higher than FSPCX's -5.11% return. Over the past 10 years, PRCOX has outperformed FSPCX with an annualized return of 16.17%, while FSPCX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.52% annualized return.


PRCOX

1D
0.28%
1M
5.68%
YTD
12.08%
6M
12.15%
1Y
28.46%
3Y*
23.19%
5Y*
14.72%
10Y*
16.17%

FSPCX

1D
0.38%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
-5.11%
6M
-1.61%
1Y
-9.24%
3Y*
12.95%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*
11.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRCOX vs. FSPCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRCOX
T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Fund
12.08%16.34%26.41%29.82%-18.80%28.06%19.82%33.04%-4.73%23.80%
FSPCX
Fidelity Select Insurance Portfolio
-5.11%3.45%28.44%12.98%7.75%29.26%0.00%30.06%-11.99%15.50%

Correlation

The correlation between PRCOX and FSPCX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1995

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between PRCOX and FSPCX has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRCOX vs. FSPCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRCOX
PRCOX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PRCOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRCOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRCOX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
PRCOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRCOX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPCX
FSPCX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
FSPCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPCX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPCX Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRCOX vs. FSPCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Fund (PRCOX) and Fidelity Select Insurance Portfolio (FSPCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRCOXFSPCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

0.91

+0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

-0.84

+4.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.73

-1.47

+16.21

PRCOX vs. FSPCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRCOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the FSPCX Sharpe Ratio of -0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRCOX and FSPCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRCOXFSPCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

-0.63

+3.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.59

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.58

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.55

+0.02

Drawdowns

PRCOX vs. FSPCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRCOX drawdown since its inception was -53.96%, smaller than the maximum FSPCX drawdown of -69.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRCOX and FSPCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRCOXFSPCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.96%

-69.48%

+15.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.32%

-10.37%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.39%

-11.69%

-7.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.94%

-16.65%

-8.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.42%

-43.68%

+9.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-9.62%

+9.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.18%

-9.70%

+0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

6.75%

-4.76%

Volatility

PRCOX vs. FSPCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Fund (PRCOX) is 3.07%, while Fidelity Select Insurance Portfolio (FSPCX) has a volatility of 4.06%. This indicates that PRCOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRCOXFSPCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

4.06%

-0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.39%

10.61%

-1.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.93%

15.27%

-3.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

17.51%

-0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.35%

20.09%

-1.74%

PRCOX vs. FSPCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRCOX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than FSPCX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRCOX vs. FSPCX - Dividend Comparison

PRCOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than FSPCX's 4.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSPCX
Fidelity Select Insurance Portfolio
4.96%3.35%8.72%8.48%0.74%8.40%8.80%6.90%32.69%12.52%2.81%3.11%
PRCOX
T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Fund
1.05%1.17%0.64%1.17%1.28%3.71%1.04%1.39%5.60%7.02%7.28%8.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRCOX and FSPCX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSPCX has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to PRCOX (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRCOX dropped -53.96% vs FSPCX's -69.48%.

PRCOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRCOX and FSPCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer