PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRCHX vs. FSIRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRCHX vs. FSIRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation and Income Fund Class I (PRCHX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRCHX achieves a 3.92% return, which is significantly lower than FSIRX's 8.40% return.


PRCHX

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.75%
YTD
3.92%
6M
4.31%
1Y
14.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FSIRX

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
8.40%
6M
9.13%
1Y
16.21%
3Y*
10.04%
5Y*
6.18%
10Y*
5.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRCHX vs. FSIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PRCHX
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation and Income Fund Class I
3.92%13.68%8.92%3.12%
FSIRX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I
8.40%10.38%5.83%2.38%

Correlation

The correlation between PRCHX and FSIRX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023

0.49

Over the past year, the correlation between PRCHX and FSIRX has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRCHX vs. FSIRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRCHX
PRCHX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
PRCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
PRCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

FSIRX
FSIRX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FSIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FSIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRCHX vs. FSIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation and Income Fund Class I (PRCHX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRCHXFSIRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.75

3.54

-0.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.99

4.97

-0.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.70

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

8.09

-4.89

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.32

32.05

-15.72

PRCHX vs. FSIRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRCHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is comparable to the FSIRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRCHX and FSIRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRCHXFSIRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75

3.54

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.85

0.60

+1.25

Drawdowns

PRCHX vs. FSIRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRCHX drawdown since its inception was -6.10%, smaller than the maximum FSIRX drawdown of -33.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRCHX and FSIRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRCHXFSIRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.10%

-33.39%

+27.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.50%

-2.05%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-1.04%

+0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.64%

-4.17%

+3.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

0.52%

+0.36%

Volatility

PRCHX vs. FSIRX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation and Income Fund Class I (PRCHX) has a higher volatility of 1.66% compared to Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX) at 1.29%. This indicates that PRCHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSIRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRCHXFSIRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

1.29%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.18%

3.77%

+0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.24%

4.76%

+0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.52%

6.92%

-0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.52%

6.74%

-0.22%

PRCHX vs. FSIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRCHX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FSIRX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRCHX vs. FSIRX - Dividend Comparison

PRCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, more than FSIRX's 4.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSIRX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I
4.20%4.72%4.80%5.28%7.33%5.37%2.23%3.09%9.42%2.63%2.37%1.75%
PRCHX
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation and Income Fund Class I
5.13%5.08%3.22%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRCHX and FSIRX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRCHX has higher volatility (1.66%) compared to FSIRX (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRCHX dropped -6.10% vs FSIRX's -33.39%.

FSIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.54 vs 2.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRCHX and FSIRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer