PRCFX vs. NWQIX
PRCFX (T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation and Income Fund) and NWQIX (Nuveen Flexible Income Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past year, PRCFX returned 11.91% vs 15.18% for NWQIX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRCFX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for NWQIX.
Performance
PRCFX vs. NWQIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRCFX achieves a 3.59% return, which is significantly lower than NWQIX's 5.19% return.
PRCFX
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- YTD
- 3.59%
- 6M
- 3.62%
- 1Y
- 11.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NWQIX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 5.19%
- 6M
- 6.53%
- 1Y
- 15.18%
- 3Y*
- 10.84%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- 5.68%
PRCFX vs. NWQIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PRCFX T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation and Income Fund | 3.59% | 11.26% | 8.76% | 3.10% |
NWQIX Nuveen Flexible Income Fund | 5.19% | 12.22% | 6.03% | 4.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRCFX and NWQIX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023 | 0.73 |
The correlation between PRCFX and NWQIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRCFX vs. NWQIX — Risk / Return Rank
PRCFX
NWQIX
PRCFX vs. NWQIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation and Income Fund (PRCFX) and Nuveen Flexible Income Fund (NWQIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRCFX | NWQIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.93 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.72 | 5.31 | -2.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.65 | 25.30 | -11.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRCFX | NWQIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 4.06 | -1.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.68 | 0.77 | +0.91 |
Drawdowns
PRCFX vs. NWQIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRCFX drawdown since its inception was -6.57%, smaller than the maximum NWQIX drawdown of -23.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRCFX and NWQIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRCFX | NWQIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.57% | -23.89% | +17.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.50% | -2.94% | -1.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | 0.00% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.69% | -3.01% | +2.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 0.61% | +0.29% |
Volatility
PRCFX vs. NWQIX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation and Income Fund (PRCFX) has a higher volatility of 1.65% compared to Nuveen Flexible Income Fund (NWQIX) at 1.22%. This indicates that PRCFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NWQIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRCFX | NWQIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.65% | 1.22% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.18% | 3.06% | +1.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.20% | 3.85% | +1.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.49% | 5.68% | +0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.49% | 6.33% | +0.16% |
PRCFX vs. NWQIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRCFX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than NWQIX's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRCFX vs. NWQIX - Dividend Comparison
PRCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, less than NWQIX's 5.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NWQIX Nuveen Flexible Income Fund | 5.93% | 6.52% | 5.20% | 7.84% | 7.02% | 4.39% | 4.82% | 5.71% | 6.23% | 5.67% | 5.52% | 5.70% |
PRCFX T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation and Income Fund | 3.32% | 2.94% | 3.08% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRCFX and NWQIX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRCFX has higher volatility (1.65%) compared to NWQIX (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRCFX dropped -6.57% vs NWQIX's -23.89%.
NWQIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.06 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRCFX and NWQIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer