PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRAP.DE vs. LYPG.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRAP.DE vs. LYPG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Core USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (PRAP.DE) and Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRAP.DE achieves a 3.31% return, which is significantly lower than LYPG.DE's 20.93% return.


PRAP.DE

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.93%
6M
3.54%
YTD
3.31%
1Y
7.09%
3Y*
3.45%
5Y*
0.94%
10Y*

LYPG.DE

1D
0.55%
1M
-5.27%
6M
21.91%
YTD
20.93%
1Y
36.79%
3Y*
26.69%
5Y*
19.14%
10Y*
23.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRAP.DE vs. LYPG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PRAP.DE
Amundi Core USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
3.31%-3.96%7.69%4.70%-10.24%6.82%-11.43%
LYPG.DE
Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc
20.93%9.20%41.03%49.19%-28.32%41.72%22.40%

Correlation

The correlation between PRAP.DE and LYPG.DE is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2020

0.15

The correlation between PRAP.DE and LYPG.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (5 years) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRAP.DE vs. LYPG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRAP.DE
PRAP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
PRAP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRAP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRAP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
PRAP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRAP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

LYPG.DE
LYPG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
LYPG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRAP.DE vs. LYPG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Core USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (PRAP.DE) and Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRAP.DELYPG.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.28

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

2.35

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.14

5.97

-0.83

PRAP.DE vs. LYPG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRAP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the LYPG.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRAP.DE and LYPG.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRAP.DE vs. LYPG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRAP.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.71%, smaller than the maximum LYPG.DE drawdown of -31.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRAP.DE and LYPG.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRAP.DELYPG.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.71%

-31.83%

+13.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.62%

-15.58%

+11.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.80%

-29.64%

+17.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.30%

-29.64%

+16.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.56%

-5.87%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.15%

-5.65%

-4.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.38%

6.14%

-4.76%

Volatility

PRAP.DE vs. LYPG.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Core USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (PRAP.DE) is 1.73%, while Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE) has a volatility of 8.14%. This indicates that PRAP.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LYPG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRAP.DELYPG.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.73%

8.14%

-6.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.18%

16.53%

-12.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.18%

21.74%

-15.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.34%

22.77%

-14.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.57%

21.52%

-11.95%

PRAP.DE vs. LYPG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRAP.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than LYPG.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRAP.DE vs. LYPG.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither PRAP.DE nor LYPG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PRAP.DE and LYPG.DE have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRAP.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRAP.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LYPG.DE.

PRAP.DE is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while LYPG.DE is Technology Equities. PRAP.DE tracks Bloomberg US Corporate Liquid Issuer Index, while LYPG.DE tracks MSCI World Information Technology. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for PRAP.DE and 0.30% for LYPG.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRAP.DE and LYPG.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer