PRAJ.DE vs. XCHA.DE
PRAJ.DE (Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF) and XCHA.DE (Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - PRAJ.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS Japan Large & Mid Cap, while XCHA.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PRAJ.DE returned 10.33%/yr vs 3.97%/yr for XCHA.DE. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PRAJ.DE charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for XCHA.DE.
Performance
PRAJ.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PRAJ.DE having a 18.28% return and XCHA.DE slightly lower at 17.62%.
PRAJ.DE
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 18.28%
- 6M
- 18.63%
- 1Y
- 36.23%
- 3Y*
- 17.10%
- 5Y*
- 10.33%
- 10Y*
- —
XCHA.DE
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- 4.79%
- YTD
- 17.62%
- 6M
- 19.04%
- 1Y
- 44.57%
- 3Y*
- 15.80%
- 5Y*
- 3.97%
- 10Y*
- 9.73%
PRAJ.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRAJ.DE Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF | 18.28% | 12.81% | 13.75% | 16.27% | -11.68% | 10.20% | -99.15% |
XCHA.DE Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 17.62% | 14.66% | 24.36% | -14.24% | -19.19% | 13.31% | 28.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRAJ.DE and XCHA.DE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2020 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRAJ.DE vs. XCHA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
PRAJ.DE
XCHA.DE
PRAJ.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF (PRAJ.DE) and Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRAJ.DE | XCHA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.47 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.71 | 7.46 | -3.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.97 | 19.02 | -7.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRAJ.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRAJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -99.42%, which is greater than XCHA.DE's maximum drawdown of -52.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRAJ.DE and XCHA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRAJ.DE | XCHA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.42% | -52.27% | -47.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.72% | -5.94% | -3.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.82% | -26.34% | +9.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.65% | -37.05% | +18.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.55% | -0.66% | -97.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -98.79% | -24.44% | -74.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 2.33% | +0.69% |
Volatility
PRAJ.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF (PRAJ.DE) is 5.43%, while Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.DE) has a volatility of 6.20%. This indicates that PRAJ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCHA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRAJ.DE | XCHA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.43% | 6.20% | -0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.35% | 11.58% | +3.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.96% | 16.44% | +2.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.66% | 21.32% | -4.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.85% | 22.20% | +20.65% |
PRAJ.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRAJ.DE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than XCHA.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRAJ.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither PRAJ.DE nor XCHA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PRAJ.DE and XCHA.DE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PRAJ.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRAJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XCHA.DE.
PRAJ.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while XCHA.DE is China Equities. PRAJ.DE tracks Solactive GBS Japan Large & Mid Cap, while XCHA.DE tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for PRAJ.DE and 0.50% for XCHA.DE.
Find the right allocation for PRAJ.DE and XCHA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer