PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRAC.L vs. SMH.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRAC.L vs. SMH.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD Acc (PRAC.L) and VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMH.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRAC.L achieves a -0.60% return, which is significantly lower than SMH.L's 76.50% return.


PRAC.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
-0.21%
6M
-1.78%
YTD
-0.60%
1Y
2.67%
3Y*
3.67%
5Y*
-1.71%
10Y*

SMH.L

1D
-3.48%
1M
-8.87%
6M
62.90%
YTD
76.50%
1Y
124.23%
3Y*
54.24%
5Y*
35.65%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRAC.L vs. SMH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PRAC.L
Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD Acc
-0.60%2.50%4.73%9.42%-21.50%2.76%1.20%
SMH.L
VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF
76.50%49.20%24.11%75.94%-35.54%42.75%4.36%

Correlation

The correlation between PRAC.L and SMH.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2020

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRAC.L vs. SMH.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRAC.L
PRAC.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
PRAC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRAC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRAC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
PRAC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRAC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH.L
SMH.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SMH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRAC.L vs. SMH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD Acc (PRAC.L) and VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRAC.LSMH.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.47

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

8.88

-8.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.83

27.77

-26.94

PRAC.L vs. SMH.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRAC.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the SMH.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRAC.L and SMH.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRAC.L vs. SMH.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRAC.L drawdown since its inception was -30.92%, smaller than the maximum SMH.L drawdown of -45.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRAC.L and SMH.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRAC.LSMH.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.92%

-45.38%

+14.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.32%

-13.91%

+7.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.52%

-36.25%

+23.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.91%

-45.38%

+19.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.17%

-11.91%

+2.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.28%

-11.12%

+2.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.22%

4.46%

-1.24%

Volatility

PRAC.L vs. SMH.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD Acc (PRAC.L) is 1.99%, while VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMH.L) has a volatility of 16.26%. This indicates that PRAC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRAC.LSMH.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.99%

16.26%

-14.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.73%

30.80%

-23.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.50%

36.96%

-26.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.23%

33.56%

-22.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.77%

32.93%

-19.16%

PRAC.L vs. SMH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRAC.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRAC.L vs. SMH.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither PRAC.L nor SMH.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PRAC.L and SMH.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SMH.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SMH.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PRAC.L.

PRAC.L is categorized as Global Equities, while SMH.L is Semiconductors. PRAC.L tracks Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD Acc, while SMH.L tracks MarketVector US Listed Semiconductor 10% Capped Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PRAC.L and 0.35% for SMH.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRAC.L and SMH.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer