PR1T.DE vs. IBCC.DE
PR1T.DE (Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C)) and IBCC.DE (iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Government Bonds funds - PR1T.DE tracks the Solactive US Treasury 0-1 Year Bond Index while IBCC.DE tracks the ICE US Treasury Short Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PR1T.DE returned 3.98%/yr vs 4.12%/yr for IBCC.DE. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PR1T.DE charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBCC.DE.
Performance
PR1T.DE vs. IBCC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PR1T.DE having a 4.68% return and IBCC.DE slightly lower at 4.60%.
PR1T.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.70%
- 6M
- 3.65%
- YTD
- 4.68%
- 1Y
- 5.34%
- 3Y*
- 3.99%
- 5Y*
- 3.98%
- 10Y*
- —
IBCC.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 3.63%
- YTD
- 4.60%
- 1Y
- 5.34%
- 3Y*
- 4.08%
- 5Y*
- 4.12%
- 10Y*
- —
PR1T.DE vs. IBCC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PR1T.DE Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C) | 4.68% | -7.38% | 11.28% | 1.27% | 6.78% | 8.43% | -6.80% |
IBCC.DE iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 4.60% | -7.23% | 11.42% | 1.23% | 7.25% | 8.42% | -6.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between PR1T.DE and IBCC.DE is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2020 | 0.93 |
The correlation between PR1T.DE and IBCC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PR1T.DE vs. IBCC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
PR1T.DE
IBCC.DE
PR1T.DE vs. IBCC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (PR1T.DE) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBCC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PR1T.DE | IBCC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.16 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 1.64 | -0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.75 | 3.74 | +0.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PR1T.DE vs. IBCC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PR1T.DE drawdown since its inception was -11.76%, smaller than the maximum IBCC.DE drawdown of -16.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PR1T.DE and IBCC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PR1T.DE | IBCC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.76% | -16.17% | +4.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.39% | -3.24% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.71% | -11.59% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.76% | -11.69% | -0.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.42% | -5.33% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.20% | -7.97% | +2.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.43% | 1.43% | 0.00% |
Volatility
PR1T.DE vs. IBCC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (PR1T.DE) is 1.51%, while iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBCC.DE) has a volatility of 1.78%. This indicates that PR1T.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBCC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PR1T.DE | IBCC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.51% | 1.78% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.26% | 4.35% | -0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.08% | 6.24% | -0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.45% | 7.57% | -0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.24% | 8.41% | -1.17% |
PR1T.DE vs. IBCC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PR1T.DE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IBCC.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PR1T.DE vs. IBCC.DE - Dividend Comparison
PR1T.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBCC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBCC.DE iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 3.99% | 4.63% | 6.49% | 4.14% | 0.47% | 0.09% | 1.39% | 1.22% |
PR1T.DE Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, PR1T.DE and IBCC.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, PR1T.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PR1T.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IBCC.DE.
PR1T.DE tracks Solactive US Treasury 0-1 Year Bond Index, while IBCC.DE tracks ICE US Treasury Short Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for PR1T.DE and 0.07% for IBCC.DE.
Find the right allocation for PR1T.DE and IBCC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer