PR1J.DE vs. XCJD.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PR1J.DE (Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D)) and XCJD.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - PR1J.DE tracks the Solactive GBS Japan Large & Mid Cap while XCJD.DE tracks the MSCI Japan Select Sustainability Screened CTB. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PR1J.DE returned 15.30%/yr vs 10.79%/yr for XCJD.DE. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PR1J.DE charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for XCJD.DE.

Performance

PR1J.DE vs. XCJD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1J.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCJD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PR1J.DE achieves a 15.82% return, which is significantly higher than XCJD.DE's 14.53% return.

PR1J.DE

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 3.47%
• YTD: 15.82%
• 6M: 16.06%
• 1Y: 30.46%
• 3Y*: 15.30%
• 5Y*: 10.01%
• 10Y*: —

XCJD.DE

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 2.70%
• YTD: 14.53%
• 6M: 14.01%
• 1Y: 26.65%
• 3Y*: 10.79%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PR1J.DE vs. XCJD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PR1J.DE Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D)	15.82%	12.92%	13.38%	8.77%
XCJD.DE Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF	14.53%	10.16%	6.89%	6.37%

Correlation

The correlation between PR1J.DE and XCJD.DE is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2023	0.96

The correlation between PR1J.DE and XCJD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PR1J.DE vs. XCJD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PR1J.DE

PR1J.DE Risk / Return Rank: 51
PR1J.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
PR1J.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
PR1J.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 48
PR1J.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
PR1J.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 54

XCJD.DE

XCJD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 45
XCJD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
XCJD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
XCJD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 42
XCJD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
XCJD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PR1J.DE vs. XCJD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1J.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCJD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PR1J.DE	XCJD.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	1.38	+0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.34	2.16	+0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.26	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.83	2.44	+0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.22	8.19	+1.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PR1J.DE vs. XCJD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PR1J.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the XCJD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PR1J.DE and XCJD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PR1J.DE	XCJD.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.54	1.38	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.69	-0.11

Drawdowns

PR1J.DE vs. XCJD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PR1J.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.08%, which is greater than XCJD.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PR1J.DE and XCJD.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	PR1J.DE	XCJD.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.08%	-16.48%	-11.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.30%	-10.52%	+0.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.24%	-16.48%	+0.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.01%	-0.41%	+0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.53%	-3.78%	-1.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.17%	3.15%	+0.02%

Volatility

PR1J.DE vs. XCJD.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1J.DE) is 3.43%, while Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCJD.DE) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that PR1J.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCJD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PR1J.DE	XCJD.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.43%	3.70%	-0.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.05%	14.79%	+0.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.93%	18.65%	+0.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.50%	17.01%	-0.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.41%	17.01%	+0.40%

PR1J.DE vs. XCJD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

PR1J.DE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than XCJD.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

PR1J.DE vs. XCJD.DE - Dividend Comparison

PR1J.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than XCJD.DE's 1.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PR1J.DE Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D)	1.51%	1.75%	1.91%	1.90%	2.21%	1.79%	1.73%	1.88%
XCJD.DE Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF	1.21%	1.36%	2.05%	1.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PR1J.DE and XCJD.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, PR1J.DE and XCJD.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, PR1J.DE or XCJD.DE?

On fees, PR1J.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PR1J.DE or XCJD.DE?

PR1J.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XCJD.DE.

What is the main difference between PR1J.DE and XCJD.DE?

PR1J.DE tracks Solactive GBS Japan Large & Mid Cap, while XCJD.DE tracks MSCI Japan Select Sustainability Screened CTB. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for PR1J.DE and 0.15% for XCJD.DE.