PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PR1H.DE vs. CYBE.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PR1H.DE vs. CYBE.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi US Treasury Bond 0-1Y UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (PR1H.DE) and iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CYBE.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PR1H.DE achieves a 0.69% return, which is significantly lower than CYBE.AS's 1.79% return.


PR1H.DE

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.13%
YTD
0.69%
6M
0.84%
1Y
1.74%
3Y*
2.76%
5Y*
1.41%
10Y*

CYBE.AS

1D
0.07%
1M
0.63%
YTD
1.79%
6M
1.92%
1Y
1.75%
3Y*
5.12%
5Y*
3.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PR1H.DE vs. CYBE.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PR1H.DE
Amundi US Treasury Bond 0-1Y UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc
0.69%2.08%3.47%2.78%-1.36%-0.61%
CYBE.AS
iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc
1.79%0.34%10.03%5.64%0.42%1.99%

Correlation

The correlation between PR1H.DE and CYBE.AS is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2021

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PR1H.DE vs. CYBE.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PR1H.DE
PR1H.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
PR1H.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PR1H.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
PR1H.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
PR1H.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PR1H.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

CYBE.AS
CYBE.AS Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
CYBE.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CYBE.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
CYBE.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
CYBE.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
CYBE.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PR1H.DE vs. CYBE.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi US Treasury Bond 0-1Y UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (PR1H.DE) and iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CYBE.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PR1H.DECYBE.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.86

1.14

+0.73

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

14.80

1.58

+13.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

68.95

3.03

+65.92

PR1H.DE vs. CYBE.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PR1H.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.83, which is higher than the CYBE.AS Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PR1H.DE and CYBE.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PR1H.DECYBE.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.83

0.69

+3.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.56

1.77

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.24

1.78

-0.55

Drawdowns

PR1H.DE vs. CYBE.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PR1H.DE drawdown since its inception was -2.84%, which is greater than CYBE.AS's maximum drawdown of -1.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PR1H.DE and CYBE.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PR1H.DECYBE.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.84%

-1.81%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.12%

-1.09%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.26%

-1.81%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.22%

-1.81%

-0.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-0.62%

+0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.76%

-0.42%

-0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

0.58%

-0.55%

Volatility

PR1H.DE vs. CYBE.AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi US Treasury Bond 0-1Y UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (PR1H.DE) is 0.20%, while iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CYBE.AS) has a volatility of 1.41%. This indicates that PR1H.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CYBE.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PR1H.DECYBE.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.20%

1.41%

-1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.35%

2.16%

-1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45%

2.51%

-2.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.90%

2.22%

-1.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.89%

2.20%

-1.31%

PR1H.DE vs. CYBE.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PR1H.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than CYBE.AS's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

PR1H.DE vs. CYBE.AS - Dividend Comparison

Neither PR1H.DE nor CYBE.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PR1H.DE and CYBE.AS have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PR1H.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PR1H.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CYBE.AS.

PR1H.DE is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while CYBE.AS is Emerging Markets Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for PR1H.DE and 0.40% for CYBE.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PR1H.DE and CYBE.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer