PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PR1G.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PR1G.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Prime Global Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (PR1G.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PR1G.DE achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly lower than 6AQQ.DE's 19.67% return.


PR1G.DE

1D
-0.12%
1M
1.11%
6M
1.61%
YTD
1.29%
1Y
1.53%
3Y*
0.20%
5Y*
-2.46%
10Y*

6AQQ.DE

1D
0.44%
1M
-1.66%
6M
20.98%
YTD
19.67%
1Y
33.76%
3Y*
23.52%
5Y*
16.54%
10Y*
21.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PR1G.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PR1G.DE
Amundi Prime Global Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
1.29%-4.74%2.19%1.15%-13.10%0.82%0.44%7.03%
6AQQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR
19.67%7.08%33.77%51.54%-29.96%39.62%34.72%29.88%

Correlation

The correlation between PR1G.DE and 6AQQ.DE is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2019

0.01

Over the past year, PR1G.DE and 6AQQ.DE have become more correlated (0.25) than their long-term average of 0.01, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PR1G.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PR1G.DE
PR1G.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
PR1G.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PR1G.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
PR1G.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
PR1G.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
PR1G.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

6AQQ.DE
6AQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PR1G.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Global Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (PR1G.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PR1G.DE6AQQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.35

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.53

3.36

-2.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.11

9.73

-8.62

PR1G.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PR1G.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the 6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PR1G.DE and 6AQQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PR1G.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PR1G.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.86%, smaller than the maximum 6AQQ.DE drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PR1G.DE and 6AQQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PR1G.DE6AQQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.86%

-31.19%

+10.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.85%

-10.01%

+7.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.94%

-26.73%

+18.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.71%

-31.19%

+13.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.11%

-2.06%

-16.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.45%

-5.35%

-6.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.38%

3.46%

-2.08%

Volatility

PR1G.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Prime Global Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (PR1G.DE) is 1.23%, while Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) has a volatility of 6.61%. This indicates that PR1G.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 6AQQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PR1G.DE6AQQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

6.61%

-5.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.01%

12.10%

-9.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.06%

16.70%

-12.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.47%

19.97%

-13.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.11%

19.69%

-13.58%

PR1G.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

PR1G.DE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than 6AQQ.DE's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PR1G.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

PR1G.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, while 6AQQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
6AQQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PR1G.DE
Amundi Prime Global Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
2.92%2.96%2.34%1.99%1.74%1.50%1.77%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


PR1G.DE and 6AQQ.DE have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PR1G.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PR1G.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for 6AQQ.DE.

PR1G.DE is categorized as Government Bonds, while 6AQQ.DE is Nasdaq-100. PR1G.DE tracks Solactive Global Developed Government Bond Index, while 6AQQ.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for PR1G.DE and 0.23% for 6AQQ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PR1G.DE and 6AQQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer