PR.TO vs. HLPR.TO
PR.TO (Lysander-Slater Preferred Share ActivETF) and HLPR.TO (Global X Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index Corporate Class ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. PR.TO is actively managed, while HLPR.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PR.TO returned 5.44%/yr vs 7.70%/yr for HLPR.TO. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PR.TO vs. HLPR.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PR.TO achieves a 3.38% return, which is significantly lower than HLPR.TO's 8.38% return.
PR.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- 6M
- 3.48%
- YTD
- 3.38%
- 1Y
- 8.63%
- 3Y*
- 14.87%
- 5Y*
- 5.44%
- 10Y*
- 5.99%
HLPR.TO
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 7.50%
- YTD
- 8.38%
- 1Y
- 16.61%
- 3Y*
- 19.84%
- 5Y*
- 7.70%
- 10Y*
- —
PR.TO vs. HLPR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PR.TO Lysander-Slater Preferred Share ActivETF | 3.38% | 11.10% | 24.22% | 7.90% | -18.17% | 28.22% | -0.17% | 0.91% |
HLPR.TO Global X Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index Corporate Class ETF | 8.38% | 18.79% | 28.13% | 2.89% | -17.83% | 23.17% | 6.42% | 0.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between PR.TO and HLPR.TO is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2019 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PR.TO and HLPR.TO has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PR.TO vs. HLPR.TO — Risk / Return Rank
PR.TO
HLPR.TO
PR.TO vs. HLPR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lysander-Slater Preferred Share ActivETF (PR.TO) and Global X Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index Corporate Class ETF (HLPR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PR.TO | HLPR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.84 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.09 | 6.71 | -0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.15 | 38.37 | -16.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PR.TO vs. HLPR.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PR.TO drawdown since its inception was -45.17%, which is greater than HLPR.TO's maximum drawdown of -38.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PR.TO and HLPR.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PR.TO | HLPR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.17% | -38.96% | -6.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.44% | -2.49% | +1.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.62% | -9.88% | +5.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.39% | -26.79% | +5.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.18% | -6.47% | -0.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.40% | 0.43% | -0.03% |
Volatility
PR.TO vs. HLPR.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lysander-Slater Preferred Share ActivETF (PR.TO) is 0.79%, while Global X Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index Corporate Class ETF (HLPR.TO) has a volatility of 1.15%. This indicates that PR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HLPR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PR.TO | HLPR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.79% | 1.15% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.67% | 2.88% | -0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.98% | 4.37% | -0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.58% | 8.35% | +0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.52% | 13.01% | -1.49% |
Dividends
PR.TO vs. HLPR.TO - Dividend Comparison
PR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, while HLPR.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLPR.TO Global X Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PR.TO Lysander-Slater Preferred Share ActivETF | 5.00% | 4.85% | 4.49% | 4.80% | 4.71% | 3.85% | 4.79% | 4.69% | 4.97% | 6.73% | 3.68% | 1.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PR.TO and HLPR.TO have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Lysander and Global X.
Find the right allocation for PR.TO and HLPR.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer