PQVM.L vs. TDGB.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

PQVM.L (Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF) and TDGB.L (VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PQVM.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index, while TDGB.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PQVM.L returned 14.37%/yr vs 17.71%/yr for TDGB.L. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PQVM.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for TDGB.L.

Performance

PQVM.L vs. TDGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVM.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

PQVM.L is traded in USD, while TDGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the TDGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PQVM.L achieves a 14.64% return, which is significantly higher than TDGB.L's 11.13% return.

PQVM.L

• 1D: -2.48%
• 1M: -4.32%
• 6M: 12.84%
• YTD: 14.64%
• 1Y: 21.20%
• 3Y*: 22.05%
• 5Y*: 14.37%
• 10Y*: —

TDGB.L

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 1.85%
• 6M: 9.77%
• YTD: 11.13%
• 1Y: 29.45%
• 3Y*: 22.34%
• 5Y*: 17.71%
• 10Y*: 10.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PQVM.L vs. TDGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PQVM.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF	14.64%	13.66%	30.18%	6.81%	0.50%	26.16%	8.04%	25.07%	-7.29%	20.74%
TDGB.L VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF	11.13%	40.77%	8.81%	14.79%	9.40%	18.51%	-2.72%	8.05%	-13.18%	6.45%

Correlation

The correlation between PQVM.L and TDGB.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2017	0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between PQVM.L and TDGB.L has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PQVM.L vs. TDGB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PQVM.L	TDGB.L
Technology	33.1%	0.3%
Industrials	16.0%	4.0%
Financial Services	13.1%	31.9%
Energy	12.1%	19.7%
Utilities	5.8%	6.2%
Healthcare	5.1%	14.4%
Consumer Cyclical	5.1%	3.8%
Basic Materials	4.3%	1.2%
Communication Services	3.0%	8.7%
Consumer Defensive	2.2%	10.0%
Real Estate	0.2%	0.0%

Return for Risk

PQVM.L vs. TDGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PQVM.L

PQVM.L Risk / Return Rank: 70
PQVM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
PQVM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
PQVM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 63
PQVM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
PQVM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 83

TDGB.L

TDGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 95
TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
TDGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
TDGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 94
TDGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
TDGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PQVM.L vs. TDGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVM.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PQVM.L	TDGB.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	2.66	-1.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.32	3.63	-1.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.48	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.66	5.79	-2.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.19	15.45	-2.26

PQVM.L vs. TDGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PQVM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PQVM.L and TDGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PQVM.L vs. TDGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PQVM.L drawdown since its inception was -34.42%, smaller than the maximum TDGB.L drawdown of -45.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQVM.L and TDGB.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	PQVM.L	TDGB.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.42%	-45.20%	+10.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.76%	-5.06%	-0.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.49%	-13.68%	-1.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.34%	-18.93%	+1.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.63%	0.00%	-5.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.89%	-8.11%	+4.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.60%	1.90%	-0.30%

Volatility

PQVM.L vs. TDGB.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVM.L) has a higher volatility of 7.40% compared to VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L) at 3.08%. This indicates that PQVM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PQVM.L	TDGB.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.40%	3.08%	+4.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.54%	8.46%	+3.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.11%	11.09%	+2.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.39%	14.19%	+2.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.15%	16.10%	+1.05%

PQVM.L vs. TDGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PQVM.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TDGB.L's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

PQVM.L vs. TDGB.L - Dividend Comparison

PQVM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than TDGB.L's 3.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PQVM.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF	0.82%	0.82%	0.84%	1.58%	1.79%	0.89%	1.48%	1.38%	1.33%	0.71%
TDGB.L VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF	3.15%	3.50%	4.26%	4.93%	4.40%	4.06%	4.16%	4.52%	4.38%	3.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PQVM.L and TDGB.L in my portfolio?

PQVM.L and TDGB.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PQVM.L or TDGB.L?

On fees, PQVM.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PQVM.L or TDGB.L?

PQVM.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TDGB.L.

What is the main difference between PQVM.L and TDGB.L?

PQVM.L is categorized as S&P 500, while TDGB.L is Global Equities. PQVM.L tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index, while TDGB.L tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for PQVM.L and 0.38% for TDGB.L.