PQVG.L vs. SPYL.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PQVG.L (Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF) and SPYL.L (SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both S&P 500 funds - PQVG.L tracks the S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index (Net Total Return) while SPYL.L tracks the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PQVG.L returned 23.87% vs 29.22% for SPYL.L. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PQVG.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPYL.L.

Performance

PQVG.L vs. SPYL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

PQVG.L is traded in GBp, while SPYL.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPYL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PQVG.L achieves a 16.37% return, which is significantly higher than SPYL.L's 10.73% return.

PQVG.L

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: 5.52%
• YTD: 16.37%
• 6M: 16.32%
• 1Y: 23.87%
• 3Y*: 21.43%
• 5Y*: 16.59%
• 10Y*: —

SPYL.L

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 5.97%
• YTD: 10.73%
• 6M: 10.55%
• 1Y: 29.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PQVG.L vs. SPYL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PQVG.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF	16.37%	5.84%	32.29%	6.06%
SPYL.L SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc	10.73%	9.03%	27.52%	9.22%

Correlation

The correlation between PQVG.L and SPYL.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2023	0.68

The correlation between PQVG.L and SPYL.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PQVG.L vs. SPYL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PQVG.L	SPYL.L
Technology	24.3%	35.6%
Financial Services	21.8%	11.8%
Industrials	15.6%	8.3%
Communication Services	10.4%	11.2%
Healthcare	9.5%	8.5%
Consumer Defensive	5.6%	4.9%
Energy	5.6%	3.5%
Consumer Cyclical	4.3%	10.1%
Basic Materials	2.2%	1.8%
Utilities	0.8%	2.3%
Real Estate	-	1.9%

Return for Risk

PQVG.L vs. SPYL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PQVG.L

PQVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 76
PQVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
PQVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
PQVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 67
PQVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
PQVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 84

SPYL.L

SPYL.L Risk / Return Rank: 73
SPYL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
SPYL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
SPYL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 71
SPYL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
SPYL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PQVG.L vs. SPYL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PQVG.L	SPYL.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.29	2.43	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.27	3.31	-0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.45	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.78	3.98	+1.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.38	13.59	+3.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PQVG.L vs. SPYL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PQVG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the SPYL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PQVG.L and SPYL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PQVG.L	SPYL.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.29	2.43	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.12	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.89	1.55	-0.66

Drawdowns

PQVG.L vs. SPYL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PQVG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.88%, which is greater than SPYL.L's maximum drawdown of -21.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQVG.L and SPYL.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	PQVG.L	SPYL.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.88%	-21.16%	-4.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.11%	-7.21%	+3.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.44%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-0.28%	+0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.17%	-2.95%	-1.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.37%	2.13%	-0.76%

Volatility

PQVG.L vs. SPYL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L) is 2.80%, while SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L) has a volatility of 3.53%. This indicates that PQVG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PQVG.L	SPYL.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.80%	3.53%	-0.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.88%	8.62%	-0.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.40%	11.87%	-1.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.89%	14.14%	+0.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.25%	14.14%	+2.11%

PQVG.L vs. SPYL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PQVG.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYL.L's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

PQVG.L vs. SPYL.L - Dividend Comparison

PQVG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, while SPYL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PQVG.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF	0.78%	0.82%	0.82%	1.61%	1.77%	0.87%	1.59%	1.41%	1.30%	0.72%
SPYL.L SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PQVG.L and SPYL.L in my portfolio?

PQVG.L and SPYL.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PQVG.L or SPYL.L?

On fees, SPYL.L is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PQVG.L or SPYL.L?

SPYL.L is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PQVG.L.

What is the main difference between PQVG.L and SPYL.L?

PQVG.L tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index (Net Total Return), while SPYL.L tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for PQVG.L and 0.03% for SPYL.L.