PQTPX vs. PCN
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund (PQTPX) and PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN).
PQTPX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 30, 2013. PCN is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 20, 2001.
Performance
PQTPX vs. PCN - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PQTPX vs. PCN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQTPX PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 4.61% | 2.41% | -3.08% | -4.21% | 11.37% | 14.83% | 9.72% | 2.83% | 2.30% | 2.21% |
PCN PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund | -3.25% | 5.55% | 19.52% | 16.22% | -22.88% | 6.93% | -2.19% | 39.10% | -5.94% | 26.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PQTPX achieves a 4.61% return, which is significantly higher than PCN's -3.25% return. Over the past 10 years, PQTPX has underperformed PCN with an annualized return of 3.75%, while PCN has yielded a comparatively higher 8.38% annualized return.
PQTPX
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -2.29%
- YTD
- 4.61%
- 6M
- 10.33%
- 1Y
- 12.11%
- 3Y*
- 2.06%
- 5Y*
- 4.29%
- 10Y*
- 3.75%
PCN
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -4.03%
- YTD
- -3.25%
- 6M
- -4.99%
- 1Y
- -2.00%
- 3Y*
- 9.33%
- 5Y*
- 2.58%
- 10Y*
- 8.38%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PQTPX vs. PCN - Expense Ratio Comparison
PQTPX has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than PCN's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PQTPX vs. PCN — Risk / Return Rank
PQTPX
PCN
PQTPX vs. PCN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund (PQTPX) and PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PQTPX | PCN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | -0.13 | +1.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.89 | -0.06 | +1.95 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 0.99 | +0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | -0.15 | +1.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.74 | -0.48 | +4.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PQTPX | PCN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | -0.13 | +1.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.16 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.38 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.39 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between PQTPX and PCN is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
PQTPX vs. PCN - Dividend Comparison
PQTPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PCN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.23%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQTPX PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.80% | 2.40% | 5.63% | 2.49% | 0.32% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 7.57% |
PCN PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund | 11.23% | 10.58% | 10.06% | 10.88% | 12.66% | 7.89% | 7.83% | 7.37% | 9.60% | 7.85% | 11.98% | 10.22% |
Drawdowns
PQTPX vs. PCN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PQTPX drawdown since its inception was -27.86%, smaller than the maximum PCN drawdown of -61.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQTPX and PCN.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PQTPX | PCN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.86% | -61.12% | +33.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.02% | -13.78% | +5.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.86% | -33.39% | +5.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.86% | -50.27% | +22.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.70% | -5.77% | -6.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.37% | -7.22% | -2.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.30% | 4.30% | -1.00% |
Volatility
PQTPX vs. PCN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund (PQTPX) is 3.61%, while PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN) has a volatility of 5.89%. This indicates that PQTPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PQTPX | PCN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.61% | 5.89% | -2.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.68% | 8.70% | -2.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.73% | 15.72% | -6.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.86% | 16.56% | -6.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.36% | 21.97% | -12.61% |