PQTPX vs. EMM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PQTPX (PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund) and EMM (Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF) are both funds - PQTPX is a Systematic Trend fund managed by PIMCO, while EMM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Global X. Over the past 3 years, PQTPX returned 0.66%/yr vs 22.67%/yr for EMM. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PQTPX charges 1.51%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for EMM.

Performance

PQTPX vs. EMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund (PQTPX) and Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (EMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PQTPX achieves a 6.40% return, which is significantly lower than EMM's 32.97% return.

PQTPX

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 1.62%
• YTD: 6.40%
• 6M: 8.65%
• 1Y: 20.99%
• 3Y*: 0.66%
• 5Y*: 3.74%
• 10Y*: 4.30%

EMM

• 1D: -1.15%
• 1M: 10.12%
• YTD: 32.97%
• 6M: 38.50%
• 1Y: 63.51%
• 3Y*: 22.67%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PQTPX vs. EMM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PQTPX PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund	6.40%	2.41%	-3.08%	-1.20%
EMM Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF	32.97%	30.21%	2.34%	3.40%

Correlation

The correlation between PQTPX and EMM is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2023	0.03

Over the past year, PQTPX and EMM have become more correlated (0.24) than their long-term average of 0.03, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

PQTPX vs. EMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PQTPX

PQTPX Risk / Return Rank: 71
PQTPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
PQTPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
PQTPX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
PQTPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
PQTPX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

EMM

EMM Risk / Return Rank: 85
EMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
EMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
EMM Omega Ratio Rank: 85
EMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
EMM Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PQTPX vs. EMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund (PQTPX) and Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (EMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PQTPX	EMM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	2.94	-0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.27	3.79	-0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.52	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.49	4.33	+0.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.74	18.13	-5.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PQTPX vs. EMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PQTPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the EMM Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PQTPX and EMM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PQTPX	EMM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47	2.94	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	1.17	-0.70

Drawdowns

PQTPX vs. EMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PQTPX drawdown since its inception was -27.86%, which is greater than EMM's maximum drawdown of -21.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQTPX and EMM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PQTPX	EMM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.86%	-21.99%	-5.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.66%	-14.75%	+10.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.69%	-21.99%	+3.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.86%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.20%	-1.15%	-10.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.41%	-4.68%	-4.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.64%	3.51%	-1.87%

Volatility

PQTPX vs. EMM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund (PQTPX) is 1.93%, while Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (EMM) has a volatility of 9.79%. This indicates that PQTPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PQTPX	EMM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.93%	9.79%	-7.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.65%	19.28%	-12.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.46%	21.69%	-13.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.91%	18.83%	-8.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.38%	18.83%	-9.45%

PQTPX vs. EMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PQTPX has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than EMM's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

PQTPX vs. EMM - Dividend Comparison

PQTPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMM Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF	0.67%	0.90%	0.80%	0.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PQTPX PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	14.80%	2.40%	5.63%	2.49%	0.32%	0.20%	0.00%	7.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PQTPX and EMM in my portfolio?

PQTPX and EMM have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PQTPX or EMM?

EMM has higher volatility (9.79%) compared to PQTPX (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQTPX dropped -27.86% vs EMM's -21.99%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.