PQTPX vs. AMFAX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund (PQTPX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (AMFAX).
PQTPX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 30, 2013. AMFAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jul 30, 2010.
Performance
PQTPX vs. AMFAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PQTPX vs. AMFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQTPX PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 4.61% | 2.41% | -3.08% | -4.21% | 11.37% | 14.83% | 9.72% | 2.83% | 2.30% | 2.21% |
AMFAX AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A | 6.43% | -9.75% | -3.56% | -10.59% | 35.38% | 3.28% | 13.29% | 8.03% | -12.87% | 6.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PQTPX achieves a 4.61% return, which is significantly lower than AMFAX's 6.43% return. Over the past 10 years, PQTPX has outperformed AMFAX with an annualized return of 3.75%, while AMFAX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.54% annualized return.
PQTPX
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -2.29%
- YTD
- 4.61%
- 6M
- 10.33%
- 1Y
- 12.11%
- 3Y*
- 2.06%
- 5Y*
- 4.29%
- 10Y*
- 3.75%
AMFAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.70%
- YTD
- 6.43%
- 6M
- 10.88%
- 1Y
- 3.13%
- 3Y*
- -3.17%
- 5Y*
- 2.03%
- 10Y*
- 1.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PQTPX vs. AMFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PQTPX has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is lower than AMFAX's 1.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PQTPX vs. AMFAX — Risk / Return Rank
PQTPX
AMFAX
PQTPX vs. AMFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund (PQTPX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (AMFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PQTPX | AMFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | 0.15 | +1.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.89 | 0.27 | +1.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.04 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 0.08 | +1.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.74 | 0.13 | +3.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PQTPX | AMFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 0.15 | +1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.15 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.12 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.28 | +0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between PQTPX and AMFAX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PQTPX vs. AMFAX - Dividend Comparison
PQTPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQTPX PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.80% | 2.40% | 5.63% | 2.49% | 0.32% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 7.57% |
AMFAX AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A | 1.73% | 1.84% | 1.28% | 0.30% | 32.70% | 5.74% | 3.14% | 4.71% | 1.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.92% |
Drawdowns
PQTPX vs. AMFAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PQTPX drawdown since its inception was -27.86%, smaller than the maximum AMFAX drawdown of -36.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQTPX and AMFAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PQTPX | AMFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.86% | -36.84% | +8.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.02% | -13.54% | +5.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.86% | -36.84% | +8.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.86% | -36.84% | +8.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.70% | -25.04% | +12.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.37% | -13.54% | +4.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.30% | 8.79% | -5.49% |
Volatility
PQTPX vs. AMFAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund (PQTPX) is 3.61%, while AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (AMFAX) has a volatility of 3.94%. This indicates that PQTPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PQTPX | AMFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.61% | 3.94% | -0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.68% | 10.02% | -3.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.73% | 13.06% | -4.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.86% | 13.68% | -3.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.36% | 12.67% | -3.31% |