PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PQJCX vs. SSCPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PQJCX vs. SSCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Small-Cap Core Equity Fund (PQJCX) and Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PQJCX achieves a 16.05% return, which is significantly lower than SSCPX's 25.40% return.


PQJCX

1D
-1.28%
1M
5.82%
YTD
16.05%
6M
13.40%
1Y
26.94%
3Y*
19.21%
5Y*
6.66%
10Y*

SSCPX

1D
-1.38%
1M
6.71%
YTD
25.40%
6M
22.02%
1Y
36.96%
3Y*
18.69%
5Y*
8.61%
10Y*
11.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PQJCX vs. SSCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PQJCX
PGIM Jennison Small-Cap Core Equity Fund
16.05%1.89%28.82%14.96%-24.07%21.70%38.85%25.61%-12.36%18.36%
SSCPX
Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio
25.40%6.41%10.79%15.16%-17.56%24.53%25.39%23.71%-16.14%15.58%

Correlation

The correlation between PQJCX and SSCPX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.94

The correlation between PQJCX and SSCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PQJCX vs. SSCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PQJCX
PQJCX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
PQJCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQJCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQJCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PQJCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQJCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

SSCPX
SSCPX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SSCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SSCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PQJCX vs. SSCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Small-Cap Core Equity Fund (PQJCX) and Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PQJCXSSCPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.32

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

3.38

-0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.31

11.48

-2.17

PQJCX vs. SSCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PQJCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the SSCPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PQJCX and SSCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PQJCX vs. SSCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PQJCX drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, smaller than the maximum SSCPX drawdown of -53.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQJCX and SSCPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PQJCXSSCPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.56%

-53.65%

+10.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.13%

-11.54%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.98%

-27.78%

+1.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.11%

-27.78%

-8.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.28%

-1.38%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.99%

-10.23%

-0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

3.39%

-0.35%

Volatility

PQJCX vs. SSCPX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Jennison Small-Cap Core Equity Fund (PQJCX) and Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX) have volatilities of 6.47% and 6.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PQJCXSSCPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.47%

6.42%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.09%

15.22%

-1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.53%

20.30%

-1.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.14%

22.23%

-0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.94%

23.02%

-0.08%

PQJCX vs. SSCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PQJCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than SSCPX's 1.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

PQJCX vs. SSCPX - Dividend Comparison

PQJCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, less than SSCPX's 7.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PQJCX
PGIM Jennison Small-Cap Core Equity Fund
2.59%3.01%18.27%0.83%0.51%26.55%3.86%0.00%7.11%1.72%0.00%0.00%
SSCPX
Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio
7.19%9.02%11.37%0.00%10.18%24.67%0.02%0.00%17.42%0.00%0.00%58.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, PQJCX and SSCPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PQJCX has higher volatility (6.47%) compared to SSCPX (6.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQJCX dropped -43.56% vs SSCPX's -53.65%.

SSCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PQJCX and SSCPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer