PQIAX vs. GSGRX
PQIAX (Principal Equity Income Fund) and GSGRX (Goldman Sachs Equity Income Fund) are both Dividend funds. Over the past 10 years, PQIAX returned 12.49%/yr vs 11.70%/yr for GSGRX. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PQIAX charges 0.86%/yr vs 1.20%/yr for GSGRX.
Performance
PQIAX vs. GSGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PQIAX achieves a 12.73% return, which is significantly lower than GSGRX's 18.68% return. Over the past 10 years, PQIAX has outperformed GSGRX with an annualized return of 12.49%, while GSGRX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.70% annualized return.
PQIAX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 8.92%
- YTD
- 12.73%
- 1Y
- 23.38%
- 3Y*
- 19.10%
- 5Y*
- 11.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.49%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.33%
GSGRX
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 2.38%
- 6M
- 14.73%
- YTD
- 18.68%
- 1Y
- 27.06%
- 3Y*
- 20.30%
- 5Y*
- 12.96%
- 10Y*
- 11.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.40%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
PQIAX vs. GSGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQIAX Principal Equity Income Fund | 12.73% | 15.29% | 26.56% | 10.77% | -10.82% | 21.88% | 6.12% | 28.44% | -5.44% | 20.53% |
GSGRX Goldman Sachs Equity Income Fund | 18.68% | 12.48% | 25.98% | 8.19% | -5.28% | 21.83% | 3.49% | 24.98% | -6.11% | 10.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between PQIAX and GSGRX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1994 | 0.92 |
The correlation between PQIAX and GSGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PQIAX vs. GSGRX — Risk / Return Rank
PQIAX
GSGRX
PQIAX vs. GSGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Equity Income Fund (PQIAX) and Goldman Sachs Equity Income Fund (GSGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PQIAX | GSGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.43 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 4.58 | -1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.01 | 18.09 | -6.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PQIAX vs. GSGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PQIAX drawdown since its inception was -54.68%, roughly equal to the maximum GSGRX drawdown of -54.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQIAX and GSGRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PQIAX | GSGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.68% | -54.44% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.07% | -5.48% | -1.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.47% | -19.02% | +3.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.22% | -19.02% | -2.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.67% | -35.11% | -2.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -0.11% | -0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.99% | -10.33% | +3.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.77% | 1.41% | +0.36% |
Volatility
PQIAX vs. GSGRX - Volatility Comparison
Principal Equity Income Fund (PQIAX) has a higher volatility of 3.02% compared to Goldman Sachs Equity Income Fund (GSGRX) at 2.81%. This indicates that PQIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PQIAX | GSGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.02% | 2.81% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.87% | 7.91% | -0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.75% | 10.42% | +0.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.24% | 16.11% | -0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.35% | 17.13% | -0.78% |
PQIAX vs. GSGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PQIAX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than GSGRX's 1.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
PQIAX vs. GSGRX - Dividend Comparison
PQIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.90%, more than GSGRX's 8.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSGRX Goldman Sachs Equity Income Fund | 8.42% | 9.72% | 18.35% | 4.70% | 4.42% | 8.01% | 1.52% | 5.56% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.79% | 1.90% |
PQIAX Principal Equity Income Fund | 8.90% | 9.92% | 20.62% | 2.58% | 5.37% | 5.05% | 1.52% | 4.30% | 7.41% | 6.28% | 3.73% | 2.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, PQIAX and GSGRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PQIAX has higher volatility (3.02%) compared to GSGRX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQIAX dropped -54.68% vs GSGRX's -54.44%.
GSGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PQIAX and GSGRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer