PQCNX vs. SCOAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PQCNX (PGIM Core Conservative Bond Fund) and SCOAX (SEI Institutional Investments Trust Core Fixed Income Fund) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, PQCNX returned -0.24%/yr vs -0.20%/yr for SCOAX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PQCNX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for SCOAX.

Performance

PQCNX vs. SCOAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Core Conservative Bond Fund (PQCNX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Core Fixed Income Fund (SCOAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PQCNX achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly higher than SCOAX's 0.41% return.

PQCNX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 0.48%
• 6M: 0.37%
• 1Y: 5.53%
• 3Y*: 3.94%
• 5Y*: -0.24%
• 10Y*: —

SCOAX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.59%
• YTD: 0.41%
• 6M: 0.32%
• 1Y: 5.63%
• 3Y*: 3.82%
• 5Y*: -0.20%
• 10Y*: 1.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PQCNX vs. SCOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PQCNX PGIM Core Conservative Bond Fund	0.48%	7.13%	1.44%	4.88%	-14.28%	-2.30%	7.01%	8.41%	-0.38%	1.89%
SCOAX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Core Fixed Income Fund	0.41%	7.56%	0.82%	5.44%	-14.84%	-1.49%	9.49%	9.59%	0.11%	5.07%

Correlation

The correlation between PQCNX and SCOAX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.96

The correlation between PQCNX and SCOAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PQCNX vs. SCOAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PQCNX

PQCNX Risk / Return Rank: 22
PQCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
PQCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
PQCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
PQCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
PQCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

SCOAX

SCOAX Risk / Return Rank: 22
SCOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
SCOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
SCOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 21
SCOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
SCOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PQCNX vs. SCOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Core Conservative Bond Fund (PQCNX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Core Fixed Income Fund (SCOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PQCNX	SCOAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	1.36	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.02	2.06	-0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.24	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.75	1.81	-0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.27	5.40	-0.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PQCNX vs. SCOAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PQCNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the SCOAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PQCNX and SCOAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PQCNX	SCOAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.35	1.36	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.04	-0.03	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.25	0.00

Drawdowns

PQCNX vs. SCOAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PQCNX drawdown since its inception was -20.33%, roughly equal to the maximum SCOAX drawdown of -20.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQCNX and SCOAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PQCNX	SCOAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.33%	-20.12%	-0.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.17%	-3.06%	-0.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.37%	-7.02%	+0.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.42%	-19.90%	+0.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-20.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.48%	-3.69%	-0.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.07%	-5.46%	-0.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.05%	1.02%	+0.03%

Volatility

PQCNX vs. SCOAX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Core Conservative Bond Fund (PQCNX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Core Fixed Income Fund (SCOAX) have volatilities of 1.33% and 1.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PQCNX	SCOAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.33%	1.39%	-0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.96%	2.87%	+0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.13%	4.08%	+0.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.11%	6.36%	-0.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.10%	5.23%	-0.13%

PQCNX vs. SCOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PQCNX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SCOAX's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

PQCNX vs. SCOAX - Dividend Comparison

PQCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, which matches SCOAX's 4.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PQCNX PGIM Core Conservative Bond Fund	4.24%	4.17%	3.91%	2.74%	1.98%	2.13%	3.13%	2.71%	2.66%	0.97%	0.00%	0.00%
SCOAX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Core Fixed Income Fund	4.26%	4.19%	3.57%	2.98%	2.11%	1.69%	6.04%	4.24%	3.16%	3.67%	3.79%	4.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PQCNX and SCOAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, PQCNX and SCOAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PQCNX or SCOAX?

SCOAX has higher volatility (1.39%) compared to PQCNX (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQCNX dropped -20.33% vs SCOAX's -20.12%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCOAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.