PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PQCNX vs. PWJZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PQCNX vs. PWJZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Core Conservative Bond Fund (PQCNX) and PGIM Jennison International Opportunities Fund (PWJZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PQCNX achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than PWJZX's 12.61% return.


PQCNX

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.12%
YTD
0.24%
6M
0.37%
1Y
4.67%
3Y*
3.86%
5Y*
-0.36%
10Y*

PWJZX

1D
-0.84%
1M
7.79%
YTD
12.61%
6M
11.25%
1Y
13.97%
3Y*
12.54%
5Y*
2.64%
10Y*
11.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PQCNX vs. PWJZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PQCNX
PGIM Core Conservative Bond Fund
0.24%7.13%1.44%4.88%-14.28%-2.30%7.01%8.41%-0.38%1.89%
PWJZX
PGIM Jennison International Opportunities Fund
12.61%14.53%6.84%20.25%-36.95%13.27%55.57%38.16%-12.93%48.58%

Correlation

The correlation between PQCNX and PWJZX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.10

Over the past year, PQCNX and PWJZX have become more correlated (0.33) than their long-term average of 0.10, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PQCNX vs. PWJZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PQCNX
PQCNX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
PQCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
PQCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

PWJZX
PWJZX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
PWJZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWJZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWJZX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
PWJZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWJZX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PQCNX vs. PWJZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Core Conservative Bond Fund (PQCNX) and PGIM Jennison International Opportunities Fund (PWJZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PQCNXPWJZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.14

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

0.82

+0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.01

2.92

+2.09

PQCNX vs. PWJZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PQCNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is higher than the PWJZX Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PQCNX and PWJZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PQCNXPWJZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

0.67

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

0.12

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.48

-0.23

Drawdowns

PQCNX vs. PWJZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PQCNX drawdown since its inception was -20.33%, smaller than the maximum PWJZX drawdown of -48.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQCNX and PWJZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PQCNXPWJZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.33%

-48.22%

+27.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.17%

-18.08%

+14.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.37%

-20.18%

+13.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.42%

-48.22%

+28.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.70%

-3.54%

-1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.07%

-13.05%

+6.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

5.09%

-4.03%

Volatility

PQCNX vs. PWJZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Core Conservative Bond Fund (PQCNX) is 1.30%, while PGIM Jennison International Opportunities Fund (PWJZX) has a volatility of 9.84%. This indicates that PQCNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWJZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PQCNXPWJZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.30%

9.84%

-8.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.93%

19.67%

-16.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.13%

22.19%

-18.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.11%

22.25%

-16.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.10%

21.04%

-15.94%

PQCNX vs. PWJZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PQCNX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PWJZX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

PQCNX vs. PWJZX - Dividend Comparison

PQCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, more than PWJZX's 0.16% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PQCNX
PGIM Core Conservative Bond Fund
4.25%4.17%3.91%2.74%1.98%2.13%3.13%2.71%2.66%0.97%0.00%
PWJZX
PGIM Jennison International Opportunities Fund
0.16%0.19%0.07%0.09%0.00%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.17%0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


PQCNX and PWJZX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PWJZX has higher volatility (9.84%) compared to PQCNX (1.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQCNX dropped -20.33% vs PWJZX's -48.22%.

PQCNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PQCNX and PWJZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer