PQCMX vs. SRUUF

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

PQCMX (PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund) and SRUUF (Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund) are both mutual funds - PQCMX is a Commodities fund managed by PGIM, while SRUUF is a Uranium fund actively managed by Sprott. Over the past 3 years, PQCMX returned 12.50%/yr vs 12.14%/yr for SRUUF. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PQCMX charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for SRUUF.

Performance

PQCMX vs. SRUUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund (PQCMX) and Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (SRUUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PQCMX achieves a 19.88% return, which is significantly higher than SRUUF's -6.21% return.

PQCMX

• 1D: -1.07%
• 1M: -10.05%
• YTD: 19.88%
• 6M: 18.18%
• 1Y: 30.29%
• 3Y*: 12.50%
• 5Y*: 10.51%
• 10Y*: —

SRUUF

• 1D: -1.88%
• 1M: -5.83%
• YTD: -6.21%
• 6M: -6.60%
• 1Y: 1.39%
• 3Y*: 12.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PQCMX vs. SRUUF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PQCMX PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund	19.88%	13.62%	5.09%	-8.67%	19.10%	3.69%
SRUUF Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund	-6.21%	12.66%	-18.89%	82.09%	7.65%	17.26%

Correlation

The correlation between PQCMX and SRUUF is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2021	0.20

Return for Risk

PQCMX vs. SRUUF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PQCMX

PQCMX Risk / Return Rank: 38
PQCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
PQCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
PQCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
PQCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
PQCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

SRUUF

SRUUF Risk / Return Rank: 4
SRUUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
SRUUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
SRUUF Omega Ratio Rank: 4
SRUUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
SRUUF Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PQCMX vs. SRUUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund (PQCMX) and Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (SRUUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PQCMX	SRUUF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	0.04	+1.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	0.30	+1.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.04	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.13	0.06	+2.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.88	0.11	+8.77

PQCMX vs. SRUUF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PQCMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the SRUUF Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PQCMX and SRUUF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PQCMX vs. SRUUF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PQCMX drawdown since its inception was -33.00%, smaller than the maximum SRUUF drawdown of -48.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQCMX and SRUUF.

Drawdown Indicators

	PQCMX	SRUUF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.00%	-48.68%	+15.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.70%	-23.98%	+11.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.70%	-48.68%	+35.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.70%	-27.13%	+14.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.79%	-21.81%	+10.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.08%	12.40%	-9.32%

Volatility

PQCMX vs. SRUUF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund (PQCMX) is 3.87%, while Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (SRUUF) has a volatility of 8.31%. This indicates that PQCMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRUUF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PQCMX	SRUUF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.87%	8.31%	-4.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.33%	24.23%	-8.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.37%	34.04%	-16.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.03%	41.67%	-24.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.18%	41.67%	-26.49%

PQCMX vs. SRUUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PQCMX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than SRUUF's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

PQCMX vs. SRUUF - Dividend Comparison

PQCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.74%, while SRUUF has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PQCMX PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund	6.74%	8.09%	4.14%	3.93%	31.36%	47.61%	0.00%	1.02%	3.02%	1.42%
SRUUF Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PQCMX and SRUUF in my portfolio?

PQCMX and SRUUF have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PQCMX or SRUUF?

SRUUF has higher volatility (8.31%) compared to PQCMX (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQCMX dropped -33.00% vs SRUUF's -48.68%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PQCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.