PQCMX vs. CCRSX
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund (PQCMX) and Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX).
PQCMX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Nov 14, 2016. CCRSX is managed by Credit Suisse. It was launched on Feb 27, 2006.
Performance
PQCMX vs. CCRSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PQCMX vs. CCRSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQCMX PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund | 26.95% | 13.62% | 5.09% | -8.67% | 19.10% | 27.81% | -1.13% | 8.78% | -12.07% | 2.96% |
CCRSX Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio | 22.81% | 15.37% | 4.86% | -8.88% | 15.71% | 28.00% | -1.49% | 6.69% | -11.63% | -6.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PQCMX achieves a 26.95% return, which is significantly higher than CCRSX's 22.81% return.
PQCMX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 10.13%
- YTD
- 26.95%
- 6M
- 32.40%
- 1Y
- 32.95%
- 3Y*
- 13.63%
- 5Y*
- 14.03%
- 10Y*
- —
CCRSX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 8.67%
- YTD
- 22.81%
- 6M
- 28.77%
- 1Y
- 29.52%
- 3Y*
- 4.65%
- 5Y*
- 13.30%
- 10Y*
- 6.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PQCMX vs. CCRSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PQCMX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than CCRSX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PQCMX vs. CCRSX — Risk / Return Rank
PQCMX
CCRSX
PQCMX vs. CCRSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund (PQCMX) and Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PQCMX | CCRSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.93 | 1.80 | +0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.50 | 2.32 | +0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.33 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.64 | 3.33 | +0.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.70 | 9.03 | +0.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PQCMX | CCRSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93 | 1.80 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.06 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | -0.00 | +0.54 |
Correlation
The correlation between PQCMX and CCRSX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PQCMX vs. CCRSX - Dividend Comparison
PQCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, less than CCRSX's 11.29% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQCMX PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund | 6.37% | 8.09% | 4.14% | 3.93% | 31.36% | 47.61% | 0.00% | 1.02% | 3.02% | 1.42% |
CCRSX Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio | 11.29% | 3.98% | 2.95% | 26.59% | 18.97% | 4.82% | 5.51% | 0.86% | 2.91% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PQCMX vs. CCRSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PQCMX drawdown since its inception was -33.00%, smaller than the maximum CCRSX drawdown of -93.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQCMX and CCRSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PQCMX | CCRSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.00% | -93.56% | +60.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.32% | -9.12% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.78% | -83.30% | +56.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -83.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -42.05% | +42.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.01% | -51.17% | +39.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.50% | 3.37% | +0.13% |
Volatility
PQCMX vs. CCRSX - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund (PQCMX) has a higher volatility of 8.15% compared to Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX) at 7.01%. This indicates that PQCMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCRSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PQCMX | CCRSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.15% | 7.01% | +1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.85% | 13.40% | +0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.19% | 16.61% | +0.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 225.84% | -208.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.10% | 159.86% | -144.76% |