PQAP vs. COMT
PQAP (PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April) and COMT (iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PQAP is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by PGIM, while COMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PQAP returned 21.47% vs 47.51% for COMT. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. PQAP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
PQAP vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PQAP achieves a 12.09% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 39.67% return.
PQAP
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 2.44%
- YTD
- 12.09%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- 1Y
- 21.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COMT
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -4.35%
- YTD
- 39.67%
- 6M
- 39.06%
- 1Y
- 47.51%
- 3Y*
- 16.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.09%
PQAP vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April | 12.09% | 14.48% |
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 39.67% | 5.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between PQAP and COMT is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025 | -0.06 |
The correlation between PQAP and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to -0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PQAP vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
PQAP
COMT
PQAP vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PQAP | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.20 | 1.40 | +0.80 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.50 | 5.95 | +9.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 86.25 | 14.11 | +72.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PQAP | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.86 | 2.24 | +2.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.76 | 0.20 | +1.56 |
Drawdowns
PQAP vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PQAP drawdown since its inception was -10.79%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQAP and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PQAP | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.79% | -51.89% | +41.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.39% | -8.02% | +6.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -4.82% | +4.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.60% | -24.07% | +23.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.25% | 3.38% | -3.13% |
Volatility
PQAP vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP) is 1.02%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that PQAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PQAP | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.02% | 7.37% | -6.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.09% | 18.80% | -15.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.45% | 21.29% | -16.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.03% | 21.06% | -10.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.03% | 18.89% | -7.86% |
PQAP vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
PQAP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
PQAP vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
PQAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than COMT's 5.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 5.54% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PQAP and COMT have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COMT has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to PQAP (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQAP dropped -10.79% vs COMT's -51.89%.
On 1-year performance, COMT leads with 47.51% vs 21.47% for PQAP. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, PQAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, COMT has performed better with a 47.51% return vs 21.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PQAP.
COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 0.02% for PQAP.
PQAP is categorized as Defined Outcome, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: PGIM and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PQAP and 0.48% for COMT.
PQAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.86 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PQAP and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer