PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPYPX vs. FHLFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PPYPX vs. FHLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAE International Fund (PPYPX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPYPX achieves a 13.69% return, which is significantly higher than FHLFX's 9.07% return.


PPYPX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.50%
YTD
13.69%
6M
12.96%
1Y
26.90%
3Y*
17.99%
5Y*
8.40%
10Y*
8.88%

FHLFX

1D
-0.42%
1M
2.55%
YTD
9.07%
6M
12.20%
1Y
21.13%
3Y*
17.01%
5Y*
8.65%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PPYPX vs. FHLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PPYPX
PIMCO RAE International Fund
13.69%31.34%-1.15%18.13%-8.73%10.68%2.05%16.43%-10.41%
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
9.07%31.96%3.67%18.16%-14.17%11.23%8.09%21.66%-10.70%

Correlation

The correlation between PPYPX and FHLFX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018

0.92

The correlation between PPYPX and FHLFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPYPX vs. FHLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPYPX
PPYPX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
PPYPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPYPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPYPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
PPYPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPYPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FHLFX
FHLFX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FHLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FHLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPYPX vs. FHLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAE International Fund (PPYPX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PPYPXFHLFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.24

1.51

+0.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.98

2.16

+0.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.27

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.92

1.99

+1.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.05

7.47

+5.58

PPYPX vs. FHLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPYPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the FHLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPYPX and FHLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PPYPXFHLFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

1.51

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.54

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.52

-0.05

Drawdowns

PPYPX vs. FHLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPYPX drawdown since its inception was -42.48%, which is greater than FHLFX's maximum drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPYPX and FHLFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPYPXFHLFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.48%

-33.58%

-8.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.48%

-11.37%

+3.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.00%

-13.62%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.65%

-29.36%

-6.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.55%

-0.84%

-0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.16%

-6.11%

-4.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

3.03%

-0.78%

Volatility

PPYPX vs. FHLFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO RAE International Fund (PPYPX) is 3.10%, while Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) has a volatility of 4.66%. This indicates that PPYPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPYPXFHLFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.10%

4.66%

-1.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.95%

12.08%

-2.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.80%

14.86%

-2.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.54%

15.98%

+3.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.02%

17.64%

+1.38%

PPYPX vs. FHLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPYPX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLFX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

PPYPX vs. FHLFX - Dividend Comparison

PPYPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.84%, more than FHLFX's 3.17% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
3.17%3.46%2.98%2.86%2.60%2.47%1.92%1.95%0.62%0.00%0.00%
PPYPX
PIMCO RAE International Fund
6.84%7.78%6.57%10.09%7.20%27.06%2.23%4.20%5.96%2.53%2.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


PPYPX and FHLFX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FHLFX has higher volatility (4.66%) compared to PPYPX (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPYPX dropped -42.48% vs FHLFX's -33.58%.

PPYPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPYPX and FHLFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer