PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPLN.TO vs. ZEO.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PPLN.TO vs. ZEO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Equal Weight Canadian Pipelines Index ETF (PPLN.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Oil & Gas Index ETF (ZEO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPLN.TO achieves a 29.04% return, which is significantly lower than ZEO.TO's 37.72% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PPLN.TO having a 10.87% annualized return and ZEO.TO not far behind at 10.67%.


PPLN.TO

1D
-0.24%
1M
6.16%
YTD
29.04%
6M
28.59%
1Y
39.15%
3Y*
18.78%
5Y*
14.07%
10Y*
10.87%

ZEO.TO

1D
0.65%
1M
2.51%
YTD
37.72%
6M
32.21%
1Y
50.73%
3Y*
27.08%
5Y*
25.42%
10Y*
10.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PPLN.TO vs. ZEO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PPLN.TO
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Pipelines Index ETF
29.04%4.14%17.18%8.45%16.63%33.83%-17.80%20.50%-11.54%-2.67%
ZEO.TO
BMO Equal Weight Oil & Gas Index ETF
37.72%12.35%21.51%5.98%39.67%63.65%-28.56%16.50%-25.62%-12.74%

Correlation

The correlation between PPLN.TO and ZEO.TO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2014

0.59

The correlation between PPLN.TO and ZEO.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (3 years) to 0.66 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPLN.TO vs. ZEO.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPLN.TO
PPLN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
PPLN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPLN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPLN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
PPLN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPLN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

ZEO.TO
ZEO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ZEO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZEO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZEO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ZEO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZEO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPLN.TO vs. ZEO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Equal Weight Canadian Pipelines Index ETF (PPLN.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Oil & Gas Index ETF (ZEO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PPLN.TOZEO.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.52

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.85

5.34

-1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.25

17.25

-6.99

PPLN.TO vs. ZEO.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPLN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is comparable to the ZEO.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPLN.TO and ZEO.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PPLN.TOZEO.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

3.02

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

1.21

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.39

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.00

+0.33

Drawdowns

PPLN.TO vs. ZEO.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPLN.TO drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, smaller than the maximum ZEO.TO drawdown of -77.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPLN.TO and ZEO.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPLN.TOZEO.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.05%

-77.71%

+18.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.22%

-9.54%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.31%

-17.62%

+2.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.54%

-22.59%

+4.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.05%

-72.03%

+12.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.93%

-2.93%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.47%

-21.98%

+12.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.84%

2.95%

+0.89%

Volatility

PPLN.TO vs. ZEO.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Equal Weight Canadian Pipelines Index ETF (PPLN.TO) is 5.77%, while BMO Equal Weight Oil & Gas Index ETF (ZEO.TO) has a volatility of 6.99%. This indicates that PPLN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZEO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPLN.TOZEO.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.77%

6.99%

-1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.56%

14.57%

-3.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.40%

16.92%

-2.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.40%

21.17%

-3.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.20%

27.27%

-4.07%

PPLN.TO vs. ZEO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPLN.TO has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than ZEO.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

PPLN.TO vs. ZEO.TO - Dividend Comparison

PPLN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, more than ZEO.TO's 2.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PPLN.TO
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Pipelines Index ETF
4.26%4.35%2.94%3.77%3.23%3.47%5.76%4.40%5.21%4.31%3.99%4.41%
ZEO.TO
BMO Equal Weight Oil & Gas Index ETF
2.59%3.42%3.86%4.82%4.69%3.27%5.54%3.55%3.57%2.46%2.50%4.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


PPLN.TO and ZEO.TO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PPLN.TO is cheaper at 0.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PPLN.TO is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ZEO.TO.

PPLN.TO tracks Mirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Pipeline Index, while ZEO.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Oil & Gas Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for PPLN.TO and 0.60% for ZEO.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPLN.TO and ZEO.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer