PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPLIX vs. PTDIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PPLIX vs. PTDIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund (PPLIX) and Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPLIX achieves a 8.79% return, which is significantly higher than PTDIX's 7.32% return. Over the past 10 years, PPLIX has outperformed PTDIX with an annualized return of 11.63%, while PTDIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.60% annualized return.


PPLIX

1D
1.18%
1M
1.71%
YTD
8.79%
6M
8.64%
1Y
21.85%
3Y*
17.96%
5Y*
9.66%
10Y*
11.63%

PTDIX

1D
1.02%
1M
1.53%
YTD
7.32%
6M
7.21%
1Y
18.66%
3Y*
16.00%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
10.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PPLIX vs. PTDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PPLIX
Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund
8.79%17.55%19.12%20.36%-18.78%17.04%16.56%26.67%-8.74%22.12%
PTDIX
Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund
7.32%15.59%17.43%18.33%-18.13%15.35%16.04%24.91%-7.95%20.69%

Correlation

The correlation between PPLIX and PTDIX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2001

1.00

The correlation between PPLIX and PTDIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPLIX vs. PTDIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPLIX
PPLIX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
PPLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
PPLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

PTDIX
PTDIX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
PTDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
PTDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPLIX vs. PTDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund (PPLIX) and Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PPLIXPTDIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.33

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

2.52

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.05

10.99

+0.06

PPLIX vs. PTDIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPLIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the PTDIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPLIX and PTDIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PPLIX vs. PTDIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPLIX drawdown since its inception was -55.61%, roughly equal to the maximum PTDIX drawdown of -54.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPLIX and PTDIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPLIXPTDIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.61%

-54.38%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.57%

-7.32%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.59%

-13.05%

-2.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.85%

-25.43%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.67%

-30.02%

-2.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-0.45%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.29%

-7.48%

-0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

1.68%

+0.27%

Volatility

PPLIX vs. PTDIX - Volatility Comparison

Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund (PPLIX) has a higher volatility of 4.79% compared to Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX) at 4.05%. This indicates that PPLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTDIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPLIXPTDIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.79%

4.05%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.10%

8.56%

+1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.23%

10.36%

+1.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.58%

13.58%

+2.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.63%

13.86%

+1.77%

PPLIX vs. PTDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PPLIX and PTDIX have an expense ratio of 0.01%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PPLIX vs. PTDIX - Dividend Comparison

PPLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.15%, which matches PTDIX's 9.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PPLIX
Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund
9.15%9.95%11.56%4.41%9.40%8.04%5.23%7.16%8.64%5.12%4.82%6.07%
PTDIX
Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund
9.13%9.80%12.28%4.40%8.61%8.92%6.01%7.26%9.28%6.07%4.86%6.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, PPLIX and PTDIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PPLIX has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to PTDIX (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPLIX dropped -55.61% vs PTDIX's -54.38%.

PTDIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPLIX and PTDIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer