PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPI vs. MQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PPI vs. MQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI) and Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPI achieves a 16.52% return, which is significantly lower than MQQQ's 38.38% return.


PPI

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.86%
YTD
16.52%
6M
17.66%
1Y
38.26%
3Y*
22.47%
5Y*
10Y*

MQQQ

1D
-0.67%
1M
20.36%
YTD
38.38%
6M
34.05%
1Y
79.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PPI vs. MQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PPI
Astoria Real Assets ETF
16.52%30.05%-2.45%
MQQQ
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF
38.38%31.67%19.72%

Correlation

The correlation between PPI and MQQQ is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024

0.61

The correlation between PPI and MQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPI vs. MQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPI
PPI Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
PPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPI Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
PPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPI Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

MQQQ
MQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
MQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
MQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
MQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
MQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPI vs. MQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI) and Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PPIMQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.39

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.82

3.16

+1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.72

11.36

+4.37

PPI vs. MQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPI Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the MQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPI and MQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PPIMQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

2.48

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

1.31

-0.51

Drawdowns

PPI vs. MQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPI drawdown since its inception was -24.54%, smaller than the maximum MQQQ drawdown of -42.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPI and MQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPIMQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.54%

-42.16%

+17.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.98%

-25.23%

+17.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.26%

-0.67%

-2.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.50%

-7.16%

+0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

7.00%

-4.56%

Volatility

PPI vs. MQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI) is 4.37%, while Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) has a volatility of 8.53%. This indicates that PPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPIMQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

8.53%

-4.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.56%

24.50%

-11.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.73%

32.18%

-16.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.04%

43.22%

-24.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.04%

43.22%

-24.18%

PPI vs. MQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPI has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than MQQQ's 1.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

PPI vs. MQQQ - Dividend Comparison

PPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than MQQQ's 1.46% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
MQQQ
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF
1.46%2.02%0.02%0.00%0.00%
PPI
Astoria Real Assets ETF
1.01%1.06%0.60%2.87%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


PPI and MQQQ have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MQQQ has higher volatility (8.53%) compared to PPI (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPI dropped -24.54% vs MQQQ's -42.16%.

On 1-year performance, MQQQ leads with 79.26% vs 38.26% for PPI. On fees, PPI is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, PPI has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MQQQ has performed better with a 79.26% return vs 38.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PPI is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for MQQQ.

MQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 1.01% for PPI.

PPI is categorized as Global Allocation, while MQQQ is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PPI and 1.30% for MQQQ.

MQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPI and MQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer