PPI vs. ALTY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PPI (Astoria Real Assets ETF) and ALTY (Global X Alternative Income ETF) are both Global Allocation funds. PPI is actively managed, while ALTY is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PPI returned 22.47%/yr vs 11.40%/yr for ALTY. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PPI charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for ALTY.

Performance

PPI vs. ALTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI) and Global X Alternative Income ETF (ALTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPI achieves a 16.52% return, which is significantly higher than ALTY's 6.19% return.

PPI

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: -0.86%
• YTD: 16.52%
• 6M: 17.66%
• 1Y: 38.26%
• 3Y*: 22.47%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ALTY

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 0.31%
• YTD: 6.19%
• 6M: 6.51%
• 1Y: 15.73%
• 3Y*: 11.40%
• 5Y*: 5.55%
• 10Y*: 6.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PPI vs. ALTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PPI Astoria Real Assets ETF	16.52%	30.05%	6.43%	11.33%	4.04%	0.22%
ALTY Global X Alternative Income ETF	6.19%	11.07%	10.88%	10.58%	-11.92%	0.06%

Correlation

The correlation between PPI and ALTY is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2021	0.62

The correlation between PPI and ALTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

PPI vs. ALTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PPI	ALTY
Industrials	31.4%	1.0%
Energy	23.1%	21.0%
Utilities	18.7%	12.7%
Real Estate	15.1%	33.2%
Basic Materials	10.6%	0.4%
Consumer Cyclical	0.6%	4.1%
Technology	0.6%	18.3%
Communication Services	-	5.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.6%
Financial Services	-	0.1%
Healthcare	-	1.4%

Return for Risk

PPI vs. ALTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPI

PPI Risk / Return Rank: 78
PPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
PPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
PPI Omega Ratio Rank: 73
PPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
PPI Martin Ratio Rank: 80

ALTY

ALTY Risk / Return Rank: 82
ALTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
ALTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
ALTY Omega Ratio Rank: 86
ALTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
ALTY Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPI vs. ALTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI) and Global X Alternative Income ETF (ALTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PPI	ALTY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.45	2.73	-0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.19	3.82	-0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.54	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.82	3.64	+1.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.72	16.84	-1.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PPI vs. ALTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPI Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the ALTY Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPI and ALTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PPI	ALTY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.45	2.73	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	0.33	+0.47

Drawdowns

PPI vs. ALTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPI drawdown since its inception was -24.54%, smaller than the maximum ALTY drawdown of -51.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPI and ALTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	PPI	ALTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.54%	-51.47%	+26.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.98%	-4.34%	-3.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.70%	-10.08%	-10.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.48%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-51.47%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.26%	-0.37%	-2.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.50%	-6.75%	+0.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.44%	0.94%	+1.50%

Volatility

PPI vs. ALTY - Volatility Comparison

Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to Global X Alternative Income ETF (ALTY) at 1.41%. This indicates that PPI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PPI	ALTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.37%	1.41%	+2.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.56%	4.38%	+8.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.73%	5.79%	+9.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.04%	10.61%	+8.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.04%	16.58%	+2.46%

PPI vs. ALTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPI has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than ALTY's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

PPI vs. ALTY - Dividend Comparison

PPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than ALTY's 8.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ALTY Global X Alternative Income ETF	8.08%	7.50%	7.88%	7.31%	7.66%	6.88%	9.20%	8.74%	8.49%	7.52%	8.20%	4.21%
PPI Astoria Real Assets ETF	1.01%	1.06%	0.60%	2.87%	2.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PPI and ALTY in my portfolio?

PPI and ALTY have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PPI or ALTY?

PPI has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to ALTY (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPI dropped -24.54% vs ALTY's -51.47%.

Which ETF is better, PPI or ALTY?

On 3-year performance, PPI leads with 22.47% vs 11.40% for ALTY. On fees, ALTY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, ALTY has been the lower-risk option at 1.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PPI or ALTY?

Over the 3-year period, PPI has performed better with a 22.47% return vs 11.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PPI or ALTY?

ALTY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PPI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PPI or ALTY?

ALTY has the higher dividend yield at 8.08%, compared with 1.01% for PPI.

What is the main difference between PPI and ALTY?

They also come from different issuers: AXS and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PPI and 0.50% for ALTY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ALTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.