PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPFIX vs. BPRLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PPFIX vs. BPRLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Princeton Premium Fund (PPFIX) and Beacon Planned Return Strategy Fund (BPRLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPFIX achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly lower than BPRLX's 5.08% return.


PPFIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.42%
YTD
1.77%
6M
1.87%
1Y
6.36%
3Y*
6.03%
5Y*
5.62%
10Y*

BPRLX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.67%
YTD
5.08%
6M
5.70%
1Y
13.20%
3Y*
18.50%
5Y*
12.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PPFIX vs. BPRLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PPFIX
Princeton Premium Fund
1.77%7.45%4.29%7.54%1.84%14.93%3.32%8.75%-5.38%1.37%
BPRLX
Beacon Planned Return Strategy Fund
5.08%11.18%31.86%19.10%-7.52%9.62%9.48%18.01%-2.47%2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between PPFIX and BPRLX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2017

0.32

The correlation between PPFIX and BPRLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (3 years) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPFIX vs. BPRLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPFIX
PPFIX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
PPFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
PPFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

BPRLX
BPRLX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
BPRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
BPRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPFIX vs. BPRLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Princeton Premium Fund (PPFIX) and Beacon Planned Return Strategy Fund (BPRLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PPFIXBPRLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+17.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

10.49

1.61

+8.87

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

25.78

3.29

+22.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

127.88

20.03

+107.85

PPFIX vs. BPRLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPFIX Sharpe Ratio is 7.64, which is higher than the BPRLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPFIX and BPRLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PPFIXBPRLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.64

2.65

+4.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.50

0.77

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.71

+0.09

Drawdowns

PPFIX vs. BPRLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPFIX drawdown since its inception was -15.64%, smaller than the maximum BPRLX drawdown of -24.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPFIX and BPRLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPFIXBPRLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.64%

-24.28%

+8.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.25%

-4.12%

+3.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.49%

-11.63%

+7.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.49%

-24.28%

+19.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.35%

-4.11%

+2.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.05%

0.68%

-0.63%

Volatility

PPFIX vs. BPRLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Princeton Premium Fund (PPFIX) is 0.17%, while Beacon Planned Return Strategy Fund (BPRLX) has a volatility of 0.69%. This indicates that PPFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BPRLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPFIXBPRLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.17%

0.69%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.54%

4.28%

-3.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84%

5.14%

-4.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.77%

15.96%

-12.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.12%

15.06%

-7.94%

PPFIX vs. BPRLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPFIX has a 1.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BPRLX's 1.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

PPFIX vs. BPRLX - Dividend Comparison

PPFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.59%, less than BPRLX's 11.94% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BPRLX
Beacon Planned Return Strategy Fund
11.94%12.54%32.86%5.82%0.00%14.20%5.09%6.68%8.70%0.32%
PPFIX
Princeton Premium Fund
5.59%5.62%6.24%6.86%1.92%7.16%0.44%0.23%0.93%2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


PPFIX and BPRLX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BPRLX has higher volatility (0.69%) compared to PPFIX (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPFIX dropped -15.64% vs BPRLX's -24.28%.

PPFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.64 vs 2.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPFIX and BPRLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer