PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPFB.DE vs. XDIV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PPFB.DE vs. XDIV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PPFB.DE is traded in EUR, while XDIV.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the XDIV.TO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPFB.DE achieves a 2.74% return, which is significantly lower than XDIV.TO's 20.08% return.


PPFB.DE

1D
0.61%
1M
-3.62%
YTD
2.74%
6M
6.18%
1Y
31.16%
3Y*
28.05%
5Y*
10Y*

XDIV.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
3.85%
YTD
20.08%
6M
18.91%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PPFB.DE vs. XDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PPFB.DE and XDIV.TO is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPFB.DE vs. XDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPFB.DE
PPFB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PPFB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

XDIV.TO
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPFB.DE vs. XDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PPFB.DEXDIV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.60

PPFB.DE vs. XDIV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PPFB.DEXDIV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.26

3.84

-2.58

Drawdowns

PPFB.DE vs. XDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPFB.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.60%, which is greater than XDIV.TO's maximum drawdown of -3.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPFB.DE and XDIV.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPFB.DEXDIV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.60%

-3.00%

-13.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.00%

0.00%

-15.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.40%

-0.69%

-3.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.55%

Volatility

PPFB.DE vs. XDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPFB.DEXDIV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.12%

9.31%

+13.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.13%

9.31%

+6.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.13%

9.31%

+6.82%

PPFB.DE vs. XDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPFB.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than XDIV.TO's 0.11% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PPFB.DE vs. XDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison

PPFB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XDIV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PPFB.DE
iShares Physical Gold ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDIV.TO
iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF
3.27%3.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PPFB.DE and XDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for PPFB.DE.

PPFB.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while XDIV.TO is Dividend. PPFB.DE tracks Gold, while XDIV.TO tracks MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for PPFB.DE and 0.11% for XDIV.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPFB.DE and XDIV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer