PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPFB.DE vs. SLVR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PPFB.DE vs. SLVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) and Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PPFB.DE is traded in EUR, while SLVR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SLVR values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPFB.DE achieves a 2.74% return, which is significantly lower than SLVR's 7.81% return.


PPFB.DE

1D
0.61%
1M
-3.62%
YTD
2.74%
6M
6.18%
1Y
31.16%
3Y*
28.05%
5Y*
10Y*

SLVR

1D
0.00%
1M
-4.13%
YTD
7.81%
6M
21.38%
1Y
101.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PPFB.DE vs. SLVR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PPFB.DE
iShares Physical Gold ETC
2.74%43.17%
SLVR
Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF
7.81%136.88%

Correlation

The correlation between PPFB.DE and SLVR is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2025

0.53

The correlation between PPFB.DE and SLVR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPFB.DE vs. SLVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPFB.DE
PPFB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PPFB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

SLVR
SLVR Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
SLVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLVR Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SLVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLVR Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPFB.DE vs. SLVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) and Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PPFB.DESLVRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.29

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

2.74

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.60

6.78

-2.18

PPFB.DE vs. SLVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPFB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the SLVR Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPFB.DE and SLVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PPFB.DESLVRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

1.71

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.26

1.74

-0.48

Drawdowns

PPFB.DE vs. SLVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPFB.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.60%, smaller than the maximum SLVR drawdown of -37.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPFB.DE and SLVR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPFB.DESLVRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.60%

-37.26%

+20.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.60%

-37.26%

+20.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.00%

-27.36%

+12.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.40%

-9.35%

+4.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.55%

15.02%

-8.47%

Volatility

PPFB.DE vs. SLVR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) is 5.11%, while Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR) has a volatility of 16.36%. This indicates that PPFB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPFB.DESLVRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

16.36%

-11.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.18%

49.22%

-29.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.12%

59.88%

-36.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.13%

55.81%

-39.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.13%

55.81%

-39.68%

PPFB.DE vs. SLVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPFB.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SLVR's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

PPFB.DE vs. SLVR - Dividend Comparison

PPFB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%.


PositionTTM2025
PPFB.DE
iShares Physical Gold ETC
0.00%0.00%
SLVR
Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF
3.92%3.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


PPFB.DE and SLVR have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PPFB.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PPFB.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SLVR.

PPFB.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while SLVR is Silver. PPFB.DE tracks Gold, while SLVR tracks Nasdaq Sprott Silver Miners™ Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for PPFB.DE and 0.65% for SLVR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPFB.DE and SLVR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer