PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPFB.DE vs. SGDJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PPFB.DE vs. SGDJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) and Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PPFB.DE is traded in EUR, while SGDJ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SGDJ values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPFB.DE achieves a -5.76% return, which is significantly higher than SGDJ's -7.11% return.


PPFB.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-8.95%
YTD
-5.76%
6M
-6.89%
1Y
23.29%
3Y*
25.83%
5Y*
10Y*

SGDJ

1D
0.42%
1M
-12.45%
YTD
-7.11%
6M
-10.04%
1Y
71.97%
3Y*
45.53%
5Y*
17.24%
10Y*
9.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PPFB.DE vs. SGDJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PPFB.DE
iShares Physical Gold ETC
-5.76%49.11%34.17%9.42%7.03%2.86%
SGDJ
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
-7.11%141.87%27.23%3.46%-23.12%-4.48%

Correlation

The correlation between PPFB.DE and SGDJ is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021

0.57

The correlation between PPFB.DE and SGDJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPFB.DE vs. SGDJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPFB.DE
PPFB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PPFB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

SGDJ
SGDJ Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SGDJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGDJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGDJ Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
SGDJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGDJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPFB.DE vs. SGDJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) and Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PPFB.DESGDJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.26

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

2.05

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.94

5.28

-2.34

PPFB.DE vs. SGDJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPFB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the SGDJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPFB.DE and SGDJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PPFB.DE vs. SGDJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPFB.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.04%, smaller than the maximum SGDJ drawdown of -59.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPFB.DE and SGDJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPFB.DESGDJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.04%

-59.10%

+37.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.04%

-35.31%

+13.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.04%

-35.31%

+13.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.04%

-31.88%

+9.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.59%

-23.78%

+19.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.95%

13.68%

-5.73%

Volatility

PPFB.DE vs. SGDJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) is 8.03%, while Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) has a volatility of 18.01%. This indicates that PPFB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGDJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPFB.DESGDJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.03%

18.01%

-9.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.40%

40.76%

-19.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.22%

48.89%

-24.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.40%

38.05%

-21.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.40%

38.72%

-22.32%

PPFB.DE vs. SGDJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPFB.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SGDJ's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

PPFB.DE vs. SGDJ - Dividend Comparison

PPFB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SGDJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.31%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PPFB.DE
iShares Physical Gold ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SGDJ
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
9.31%8.37%6.55%4.55%2.46%2.20%1.97%0.65%0.00%0.14%1.77%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


PPFB.DE and SGDJ have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PPFB.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PPFB.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SGDJ.

PPFB.DE tracks Gold, while SGDJ tracks Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for PPFB.DE and 0.50% for SGDJ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPFB.DE and SGDJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer