PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPEM vs. FTHF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PPEM vs. FTHF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Panagora ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF - (PPEM) and First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PPEM vs. FTHF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PPEM
Putnam Panagora ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF -
5.27%35.39%7.50%11.55%
FTHF
First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF
13.15%65.30%-8.14%18.14%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPEM achieves a 5.27% return, which is significantly lower than FTHF's 13.15% return.


PPEM

1D
4.09%
1M
-10.61%
YTD
5.27%
6M
8.34%
1Y
38.04%
3Y*
16.98%
5Y*
10Y*

FTHF

1D
4.87%
1M
-11.82%
YTD
13.15%
6M
30.54%
1Y
74.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PPEM vs. FTHF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPEM has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than FTHF's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PPEM vs. FTHF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPEM
PPEM Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
PPEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
PPEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

FTHF
FTHF Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FTHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTHF Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FTHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTHF Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPEM vs. FTHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Panagora ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF - (PPEM) and First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PPEMFTHFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.81

2.39

-0.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.44

2.97

-0.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.50

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

4.52

-2.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.97

13.04

-3.07

PPEM vs. FTHF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the FTHF Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPEM and FTHF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PPEMFTHFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

2.39

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

1.42

-0.59

Correlation

The correlation between PPEM and FTHF is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PPEM vs. FTHF - Dividend Comparison

PPEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 61.46%, more than FTHF's 3.98% yield.


Drawdowns

PPEM vs. FTHF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPEM drawdown since its inception was -18.44%, which is greater than FTHF's maximum drawdown of -17.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPEM and FTHF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PPEMFTHFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.44%

-17.36%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.28%

-16.31%

+1.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.81%

-12.23%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-4.33%

+0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.69%

5.65%

-1.96%

Volatility

PPEM vs. FTHF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam Panagora ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF - (PPEM) is 11.49%, while First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) has a volatility of 15.47%. This indicates that PPEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PPEMFTHFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.49%

15.47%

-3.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.26%

20.68%

-4.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.10%

31.44%

-10.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.49%

24.24%

-6.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

24.24%

-6.75%