PPA vs. MOAT

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

PPA (Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF) and MOAT (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PPA is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the SPADE Defense Index, while MOAT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PPA returned 17.28%/yr vs 13.45%/yr for MOAT. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PPA charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for MOAT.

Performance

PPA vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPA achieves a 8.41% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's -1.74% return. Over the past 10 years, PPA has outperformed MOAT with an annualized return of 17.28%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively lower 13.45% annualized return.

PPA

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 1.28%
• YTD: 8.41%
• 6M: 11.71%
• 1Y: 25.14%
• 3Y*: 28.15%
• 5Y*: 17.94%
• 10Y*: 17.28%

MOAT

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: -1.74%
• 6M: -1.13%
• 1Y: 13.15%
• 3Y*: 10.81%
• 5Y*: 7.70%
• 10Y*: 13.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PPA vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF	8.41%	37.15%	25.28%	18.41%	9.52%	7.09%	0.45%	39.63%	-7.51%	30.10%
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF	-1.74%	13.20%	10.73%	31.89%	-13.66%	24.12%	14.84%	34.79%	-1.28%	23.18%

Correlation

The correlation between PPA and MOAT is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2012	0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between PPA and MOAT has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PPA vs. MOAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PPA	MOAT
Industrials	90.6%	13.5%
Technology	9.3%	32.8%
Communication Services	0.1%	2.4%
Financial Services	0.0%	6.7%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	10.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	17.5%
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	16.0%
Real Estate	-	0.8%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PPA vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPA

PPA Risk / Return Rank: 40
PPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
PPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
PPA Omega Ratio Rank: 38
PPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
PPA Martin Ratio Rank: 37

MOAT

MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 27
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 27
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPA vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PPA	MOAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	0.95	+0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	1.45	+0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.17	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.84	1.06	+0.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.29	3.29	+2.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PPA vs. MOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPA Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the MOAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPA and MOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PPA	MOAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.32	0.95	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97	0.43	+0.55
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84	0.72	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	0.77	-0.11

Drawdowns

PPA vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPA drawdown since its inception was -57.37%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPA and MOAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	PPA	MOAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.37%	-33.31%	-24.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.71%	-12.43%	-1.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.24%	-21.44%	+6.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.37%	-23.96%	+5.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.92%	-33.31%	-10.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.50%	-5.49%	-3.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.18%	-3.83%	-5.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.76%	4.01%	+0.75%

Volatility

PPA vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) has a higher volatility of 6.71% compared to VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) at 4.01%. This indicates that PPA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PPA	MOAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.71%	4.01%	+2.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.11%	9.90%	+6.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.23%	13.90%	+5.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.53%	18.19%	+0.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.66%	18.69%	+1.97%

PPA vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPA has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than MOAT's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

PPA vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

PPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than MOAT's 1.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF	1.38%	1.36%	1.37%	0.86%	1.25%	1.08%	1.46%	1.31%	1.79%	1.07%	1.17%	2.13%
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF	0.39%	0.42%	0.61%	0.67%	0.83%	0.59%	0.88%	0.95%	0.90%	0.67%	1.70%	1.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PPA and MOAT in my portfolio?

PPA and MOAT have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PPA or MOAT?

PPA has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to MOAT (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPA dropped -57.37% vs MOAT's -33.31%.

Which ETF is better, PPA or MOAT?

On 10-year performance, PPA leads with 17.28% vs 13.45% for MOAT. On fees, MOAT is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, MOAT has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PPA or MOAT?

Over the 10-year period, PPA has performed better with a 17.28% return vs 13.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PPA or MOAT?

MOAT is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PPA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PPA or MOAT?

MOAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.39% for PPA.

What is the main difference between PPA and MOAT?

PPA is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while MOAT is Large Cap Blend Equities. PPA tracks SPADE Defense Index, while MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PPA and 0.47% for MOAT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.