PPA vs. BND
PPA (Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF) and BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PPA is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the SPADE Defense Index, while BND is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PPA returned 17.28%/yr vs 1.53%/yr for BND. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. PPA charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BND.
Performance
PPA vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPA achieves a 8.41% return, which is significantly higher than BND's -0.07% return. Over the past 10 years, PPA has outperformed BND with an annualized return of 17.28%, while BND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.53% annualized return.
PPA
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- 8.41%
- 6M
- 11.71%
- 1Y
- 25.14%
- 3Y*
- 28.15%
- 5Y*
- 17.94%
- 10Y*
- 17.28%
BND
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 0.23%
- 1Y
- 4.87%
- 3Y*
- 3.89%
- 5Y*
- -0.05%
- 10Y*
- 1.53%
PPA vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF | 8.41% | 37.15% | 25.28% | 18.41% | 9.52% | 7.09% | 0.45% | 39.63% | -7.51% | 30.10% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | -0.07% | 7.08% | 1.38% | 5.65% | -13.11% | -1.86% | 7.71% | 8.84% | -0.12% | 3.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPA and BND is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2007 | -0.15 |
The correlation between PPA and BND shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPA vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank
PPA
BND
PPA vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PPA | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.23 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 1.83 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.29 | 5.43 | -0.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PPA | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 1.32 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 | -0.01 | +0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.28 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.58 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
PPA vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPA drawdown since its inception was -57.37%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPA and BND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPA | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.37% | -18.58% | -38.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.71% | -2.68% | -11.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.24% | -5.92% | -9.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.37% | -17.91% | -0.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.92% | -18.58% | -25.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.50% | -2.70% | -5.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.18% | -3.06% | -6.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.76% | 0.90% | +3.86% |
Volatility
PPA vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) has a higher volatility of 6.71% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.20%. This indicates that PPA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPA | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.71% | 1.20% | +5.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.11% | 2.69% | +13.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.23% | 3.72% | +15.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.53% | 6.02% | +12.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.66% | 5.53% | +15.13% |
PPA vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
PPA has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
PPA vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
PPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than BND's 3.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.98% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.39% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.67% | 0.83% | 0.59% | 0.88% | 0.95% | 0.90% | 0.67% | 1.70% | 1.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PPA and BND have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PPA has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to BND (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPA dropped -57.37% vs BND's -18.58%.
On 10-year performance, PPA leads with 17.28% vs 1.53% for BND. On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BND has been the lower-risk option at 1.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PPA has performed better with a 17.28% return vs 1.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PPA.
BND has the higher dividend yield at 3.98%, compared with 0.39% for PPA.
PPA is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while BND is Total Bond Market. PPA tracks SPADE Defense Index, while BND tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PPA and 0.03% for BND.
BND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PPA and BND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer