POWL vs. GDMN

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

POWL (Powell Industries, Inc.) is a stock, while GDMN (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund) is Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. Over the past 3 years, POWL returned 152.04%/yr vs 56.96%/yr for GDMN. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

POWL vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POWL achieves a 179.92% return, which is significantly higher than GDMN's -11.31% return.

POWL

• 1D: 1.08%
• 1M: 6.44%
• YTD: 179.92%
• 6M: 168.05%
• 1Y: 409.65%
• 3Y*: 152.04%
• 5Y*: 97.30%
• 10Y*: 40.41%

GDMN

• 1D: -2.56%
• 1M: -10.55%
• YTD: -11.31%
• 6M: -13.58%
• 1Y: 65.62%
• 3Y*: 56.96%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POWL vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
POWL Powell Industries, Inc.	179.92%	44.49%	152.21%	155.62%	24.34%	0.75%
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	-11.31%	237.09%	28.23%	12.97%	-14.62%	6.93%

Correlation

The correlation between POWL and GDMN is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021	0.11

The correlation between POWL and GDMN shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

POWL vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POWL

POWL Risk / Return Rank: 98
POWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
POWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
POWL Omega Ratio Rank: 97
POWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
POWL Martin Ratio Rank: 99

GDMN

GDMN Risk / Return Rank: 29
GDMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
GDMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
GDMN Omega Ratio Rank: 33
GDMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
GDMN Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POWL vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	POWL	GDMN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	6.79	1.00	+5.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.19	1.47	+3.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.65	1.21	+0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	13.05	1.31	+11.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	41.25	3.42	+37.82

POWL vs. GDMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POWL Sharpe Ratio is 6.79, which is higher than the GDMN Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POWL and GDMN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

POWL vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POWL drawdown since its inception was -73.10%, which is greater than GDMN's maximum drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWL and GDMN.

Drawdown Indicators

	POWL	GDMN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.10%	-52.82%	-20.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.88%	-48.76%	+17.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-55.76%	-48.76%	-7.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-68.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.68%	-41.78%	+34.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.08%	-19.09%	-16.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.75%	18.58%	-8.83%

Volatility

POWL vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) is 17.69%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a volatility of 22.11%. This indicates that POWL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	POWL	GDMN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.69%	22.11%	-4.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	44.22%	54.94%	-10.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.38%	63.83%	-4.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	64.36%	48.18%	+16.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.86%	48.18%	+6.68%

Dividends

POWL vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison

POWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than GDMN's 3.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	3.05%	2.70%	9.44%	7.69%	1.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
POWL Powell Industries, Inc.	0.12%	0.34%	0.48%	1.19%	2.96%	3.53%	3.53%	2.12%	4.16%	3.63%	2.67%	4.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both POWL and GDMN in my portfolio?

POWL and GDMN have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, POWL or GDMN?

GDMN has higher volatility (22.11%) compared to POWL (17.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POWL dropped -73.10% vs GDMN's -52.82%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

POWL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.79 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.