POW vs. OMAH

Last updated Jul 10, 2026

POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares, while OMAH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by VistaShares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. POW charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.

Performance

POW vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POW achieves a 42.34% return, which is significantly higher than OMAH's 8.58% return.

POW

• 1D: 1.23%
• 1M: -4.96%
• 6M: 39.30%
• YTD: 42.34%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMAH

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 3.00%
• 6M: 7.60%
• YTD: 8.58%
• 1Y: 12.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POW vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	42.34%	-1.70%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	8.58%	0.38%

Correlation

The correlation between POW and OMAH is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.04

Return for Risk

POW vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 65
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 53
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POW vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	POW	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.53	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.16	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.27	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.19	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.83	—

Drawdowns

POW vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POW drawdown since its inception was -17.41%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POW and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	POW	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.41%	-11.83%	-5.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.37%	-0.47%	-15.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.18%	-1.25%	-2.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.28%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	POW	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.75%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.92%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.79%	8.20%	+24.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.79%	12.95%	+19.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.79%	12.95%	+19.84%

POW vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

POW has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

POW vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

POW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than OMAH's 15.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	15.02%	12.86%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.13%	0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both POW and OMAH in my portfolio?

POW and OMAH have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, POW or OMAH?

On fees, POW is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, POW or OMAH?

POW is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OMAH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, POW or OMAH?

OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 15.02%, compared with 0.13% for POW.

What is the main difference between POW and OMAH?

POW is categorized as Actively Managed, while OMAH is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for POW and 0.95% for OMAH.