POOL vs. IGM
POOL (Pool Corporation) is a stock, while IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index. Over the past 10 years, POOL returned 8.26%/yr vs 23.41%/yr for IGM. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
POOL vs. IGM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POOL achieves a -13.35% return, which is significantly lower than IGM's 21.55% return. Over the past 10 years, POOL has underperformed IGM with an annualized return of 8.26%, while IGM has yielded a comparatively higher 23.41% annualized return.
POOL
- 1D
- 5.31%
- 1M
- -10.89%
- 6M
- -21.84%
- YTD
- -13.35%
- 1Y
- -35.22%
- 3Y*
- -18.66%
- 5Y*
- -15.53%
- 10Y*
- 8.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.28%
IGM
- 1D
- 2.20%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- 6M
- 20.71%
- YTD
- 21.55%
- 1Y
- 38.56%
- 3Y*
- 33.72%
- 5Y*
- 18.11%
- 10Y*
- 23.41%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.48%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $47.27M | $46.48M | $81.75M | |
POOL Pool Corporation | $211.72M | $178.65M | $198.39M |
POOL vs. IGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POOL Pool Corporation | -13.35% | -31.81% | -13.39% | 33.51% | -46.03% | 52.98% | 76.95% | 44.50% | 15.97% | 25.78% |
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 21.55% | 26.76% | 36.99% | 60.68% | -35.83% | 25.72% | 45.11% | 41.81% | 2.26% | 37.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between POOL and IGM is 0.10, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2001 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, the correlation between POOL and IGM has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POOL vs. IGM — Risk / Return Rank
POOL
IGM
POOL vs. IGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pool Corporation (POOL) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| POOL | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.27 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | 2.36 | -3.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.19 | 6.77 | -7.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
POOL vs. IGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POOL drawdown since its inception was -75.71%, which is greater than IGM's maximum drawdown of -65.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POOL and IGM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POOL | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.71% | -65.59% | -10.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.86% | -16.44% | -30.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.77% | -26.39% | -30.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.85% | -40.68% | -27.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.85% | -40.68% | -27.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.88% | -8.21% | -55.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.56% | -15.18% | -3.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.68% | 5.71% | +23.97% |
Volatility
POOL vs. IGM - Volatility Comparison
Pool Corporation (POOL) has a higher volatility of 12.65% compared to iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) at 8.47%. This indicates that POOL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POOL | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.65% | 8.47% | +4.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.58% | 20.36% | +9.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.33% | 24.40% | +10.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.55% | 26.36% | +8.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.91% | 24.85% | +7.06% |
Dividends
POOL vs. IGM - Dividend Comparison
POOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, more than IGM's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.66% | 0.16% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.90% | 0.79% |
POOL Pool Corporation | 2.58% | 2.16% | 1.38% | 1.08% | 1.26% | 0.53% | 0.61% | 0.99% | 1.16% | 1.10% | 1.14% | 1.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
POOL and IGM have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
POOL has higher volatility (12.65%) compared to IGM (8.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POOL dropped -75.71% vs IGM's -65.59%.
IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for POOL and IGM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer