PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PONAX vs. PQTAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PONAX vs. PQTAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Income Fund Class A (PONAX) and PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (PQTAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PONAX achieves a 0.64% return, which is significantly lower than PQTAX's 4.95% return. Over the past 10 years, PONAX has outperformed PQTAX with an annualized return of 4.32%, while PQTAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.03% annualized return.


PONAX

1D
0.09%
1M
0.97%
YTD
0.64%
6M
1.02%
1Y
6.55%
3Y*
7.20%
5Y*
3.10%
10Y*
4.32%

PQTAX

1D
-0.92%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
4.95%
6M
5.46%
1Y
18.23%
3Y*
0.39%
5Y*
3.12%
10Y*
4.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PONAX vs. PQTAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PONAX
PIMCO Income Fund Class A
0.64%10.63%5.02%8.96%-9.34%2.21%5.40%7.65%0.21%8.19%
PQTAX
PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A
4.95%2.06%-3.31%-4.52%11.06%14.52%8.48%2.63%1.98%4.51%

Correlation

The correlation between PONAX and PQTAX is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

-0.09

The correlation between PONAX and PQTAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (5 years) to 0.01 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PONAX vs. PQTAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PONAX
PONAX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
PONAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PONAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
PONAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
PONAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
PONAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

PQTAX
PQTAX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
PQTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PQTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PONAX vs. PQTAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Income Fund Class A (PONAX) and PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (PQTAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PONAXPQTAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.41

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

4.11

-2.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.26

11.10

-4.84

PONAX vs. PQTAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PONAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the PQTAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PONAX and PQTAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PONAX vs. PQTAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PONAX drawdown since its inception was -13.64%, smaller than the maximum PQTAX drawdown of -28.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PONAX and PQTAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PONAXPQTAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.64%

-28.39%

+14.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.69%

-4.66%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.90%

-18.94%

+15.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.64%

-28.39%

+14.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.64%

-28.39%

+14.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

-13.28%

+12.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.79%

-9.39%

+7.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

1.72%

-0.61%

Volatility

PONAX vs. PQTAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Income Fund Class A (PONAX) is 1.32%, while PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (PQTAX) has a volatility of 2.15%. This indicates that PONAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PQTAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PONAXPQTAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

2.15%

-0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.38%

6.82%

-3.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.14%

8.58%

-4.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.83%

9.95%

-5.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.22%

9.35%

-5.13%

PONAX vs. PQTAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PONAX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than PQTAX's 1.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

PONAX vs. PQTAX - Dividend Comparison

PONAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.44%, more than PQTAX's 1.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PONAX
PIMCO Income Fund Class A
5.44%5.61%5.86%5.86%4.66%3.62%4.48%5.42%5.24%4.97%5.13%7.45%
PQTAX
PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A
1.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%14.61%2.22%4.46%2.29%0.10%2.54%0.00%7.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


PONAX and PQTAX have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PQTAX has higher volatility (2.15%) compared to PONAX (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PONAX dropped -13.64% vs PQTAX's -28.39%.

PQTAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PONAX and PQTAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer