PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
POLEX vs. GQGPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

POLEX vs. GQGPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polar Capital Emerging Market Stars Fund (POLEX) and GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund (GQGPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POLEX achieves a 29.24% return, which is significantly higher than GQGPX's 5.99% return.


POLEX

1D
0.92%
1M
6.47%
YTD
29.24%
6M
30.91%
1Y
55.49%
3Y*
21.98%
5Y*
5.48%
10Y*

GQGPX

1D
0.64%
1M
-0.79%
YTD
5.99%
6M
6.17%
1Y
14.09%
3Y*
12.03%
5Y*
3.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POLEX vs. GQGPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
POLEX
Polar Capital Emerging Market Stars Fund
29.24%25.80%6.91%12.41%-29.27%-6.12%
GQGPX
GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund
5.99%9.67%6.00%28.47%-21.01%-6.69%

Correlation

The correlation between POLEX and GQGPX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2021

0.73

The correlation between POLEX and GQGPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

POLEX vs. GQGPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POLEX
POLEX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
POLEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POLEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
POLEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
POLEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
POLEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

GQGPX
GQGPX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
GQGPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQGPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQGPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
GQGPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQGPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POLEX vs. GQGPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polar Capital Emerging Market Stars Fund (POLEX) and GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund (GQGPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


POLEXGQGPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.22

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.59

1.54

+3.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.60

4.80

+10.81

POLEX vs. GQGPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POLEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is higher than the GQGPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POLEX and GQGPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

POLEX vs. GQGPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POLEX drawdown since its inception was -45.74%, which is greater than GQGPX's maximum drawdown of -33.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POLEX and GQGPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


POLEXGQGPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.74%

-33.68%

-12.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.75%

-9.12%

-4.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.94%

-18.83%

-3.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.96%

-29.31%

-12.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-4.48%

+4.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.03%

-11.49%

-11.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.88%

2.92%

+0.96%

Volatility

POLEX vs. GQGPX - Volatility Comparison

Polar Capital Emerging Market Stars Fund (POLEX) has a higher volatility of 12.00% compared to GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund (GQGPX) at 3.24%. This indicates that POLEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQGPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


POLEXGQGPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.00%

3.24%

+8.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.49%

9.67%

+10.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.63%

11.51%

+12.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.20%

14.71%

+6.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.11%

15.90%

+5.21%

POLEX vs. GQGPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

POLEX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than GQGPX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

POLEX vs. GQGPX - Dividend Comparison

POLEX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GQGPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GQGPX
GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund
1.81%1.91%1.50%2.54%5.52%3.78%0.15%1.06%0.59%0.17%
POLEX
Polar Capital Emerging Market Stars Fund
0.00%0.00%0.31%0.42%0.00%3.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


POLEX and GQGPX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

POLEX has higher volatility (12.00%) compared to GQGPX (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POLEX dropped -45.74% vs GQGPX's -33.68%.

POLEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for POLEX and GQGPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer