PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
POGSX vs. AMFEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

POGSX vs. AMFEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pin Oak Equity (POGSX) and AAMA Equity Fund (AMFEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

POGSX vs. AMFEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
POGSX
Pin Oak Equity
5.66%27.41%18.99%27.16%-25.10%21.42%10.60%27.72%-9.56%
AMFEX
AAMA Equity Fund
0.48%17.33%16.28%17.32%-14.08%22.58%12.70%24.62%-9.60%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POGSX achieves a 5.66% return, which is significantly higher than AMFEX's 0.48% return.


POGSX

1D
-0.02%
1M
-5.28%
YTD
5.66%
6M
12.41%
1Y
33.37%
3Y*
25.41%
5Y*
11.32%
10Y*
13.07%

AMFEX

1D
-0.32%
1M
-6.02%
YTD
0.48%
6M
4.27%
1Y
18.55%
3Y*
15.18%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


POGSX vs. AMFEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

POGSX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than AMFEX's 1.17% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

POGSX vs. AMFEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POGSX
POGSX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
POGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
POGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
POGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
POGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

AMFEX
AMFEX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
AMFEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMFEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMFEX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
AMFEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMFEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POGSX vs. AMFEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pin Oak Equity (POGSX) and AAMA Equity Fund (AMFEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


POGSXAMFEXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.74

1.34

+0.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.75

1.90

+0.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.30

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

1.67

+1.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.79

8.69

+3.10

POGSX vs. AMFEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POGSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the AMFEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POGSX and AMFEX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


POGSXAMFEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

1.34

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.70

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.64

-0.35

Correlation

The correlation between POGSX and AMFEX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

POGSX vs. AMFEX - Dividend Comparison

POGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.99%, more than AMFEX's 11.93% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
POGSX
Pin Oak Equity
17.99%8.85%17.87%8.21%0.15%10.93%4.60%3.22%2.94%1.79%2.03%3.83%
AMFEX
AAMA Equity Fund
11.93%11.99%9.19%0.92%4.82%0.22%0.44%0.78%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

POGSX vs. AMFEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POGSX drawdown since its inception was -89.46%, which is greater than AMFEX's maximum drawdown of -30.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POGSX and AMFEX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


POGSXAMFEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.46%

-30.41%

-59.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.96%

-10.50%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.81%

-21.21%

-8.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.03%

-6.07%

-1.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.91%

-4.39%

-32.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

2.02%

+0.63%

Volatility

POGSX vs. AMFEX - Volatility Comparison

Pin Oak Equity (POGSX) has a higher volatility of 3.76% compared to AAMA Equity Fund (AMFEX) at 3.18%. This indicates that POGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMFEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


POGSXAMFEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.76%

3.18%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.91%

7.27%

+5.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.62%

14.62%

+5.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.85%

14.20%

+3.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.56%

17.07%

+1.49%