POET vs. QTUM

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

POET (POET Technologies Inc) is a stock, while QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. Over the past 5 years, POET returned 8.44%/yr vs 28.09%/yr for QTUM. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

POET vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in POET Technologies Inc (POET) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POET achieves a 97.95% return, which is significantly higher than QTUM's 47.39% return.

POET

• 1D: 11.38%
• 1M: -12.80%
• YTD: 97.95%
• 6M: 92.77%
• 1Y: 203.39%
• 3Y*: 31.98%
• 5Y*: 8.44%
• 10Y*: 6.18%

QTUM

• 1D: 1.22%
• 1M: 9.88%
• YTD: 47.39%
• 6M: 45.72%
• 1Y: 82.93%
• 3Y*: 48.15%
• 5Y*: 28.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POET vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
POET POET Technologies Inc	97.95%	6.39%	536.09%	-69.03%	-57.46%	9.79%	130.96%	38.41%	-22.19%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	47.39%	36.65%	50.54%	39.86%	-28.80%	35.18%	42.05%	47.99%	-19.44%

Correlation

The correlation between POET and QTUM is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018	0.29

The correlation between POET and QTUM shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.48 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

POET vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POET

POET Risk / Return Rank: 84
POET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
POET Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
POET Omega Ratio Rank: 85
POET Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
POET Martin Ratio Rank: 82

QTUM

QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 90
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 87
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POET vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for POET Technologies Inc (POET) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	POET	QTUM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	2.94	-1.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	3.45	-0.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.46	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.64	5.46	-1.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.85	19.77	-12.92

POET vs. QTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POET Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the QTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POET and QTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

POET vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POET drawdown since its inception was -93.47%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POET and QTUM.

Drawdown Indicators

	POET	QTUM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.47%	-38.45%	-55.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.29%	-15.26%	-41.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-85.53%	-25.39%	-60.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-93.47%	-38.45%	-55.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-93.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-39.09%	-4.42%	-34.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-61.09%	-8.24%	-52.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.83%	4.21%	+25.62%

Volatility

POET vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison

POET Technologies Inc (POET) has a higher volatility of 62.31% compared to Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) at 14.18%. This indicates that POET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	POET	QTUM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	62.31%	14.18%	+48.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	122.52%	23.17%	+99.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	140.70%	28.39%	+112.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	107.33%	26.99%	+80.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	99.24%	27.40%	+71.84%

Dividends

POET vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

POET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
POET POET Technologies Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	0.73%	1.01%	0.61%	0.81%	1.46%	0.48%	0.42%	0.61%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both POET and QTUM in my portfolio?

POET and QTUM have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, POET or QTUM?

POET has higher volatility (62.31%) compared to QTUM (14.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POET dropped -93.47% vs QTUM's -38.45%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.