PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
POET vs. PLTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

POET vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in POET Technologies Inc (POET) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POET achieves a 94.00% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -23.22% return.


POET

1D
3.54%
1M
12.15%
YTD
94.00%
6M
97.11%
1Y
193.08%
3Y*
34.92%
5Y*
5.05%
10Y*
5.63%

PLTR

1D
0.69%
1M
-0.97%
YTD
-23.22%
6M
-24.81%
1Y
6.85%
3Y*
108.67%
5Y*
41.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POET vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
POET
POET Technologies Inc
94.00%6.39%536.09%-69.03%-57.46%9.79%61.59%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
-23.22%135.03%340.48%167.45%-64.74%-22.68%147.89%

Correlation

The correlation between POET and PLTR is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2020

0.19

The correlation between POET and PLTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

POET:

-$1.11

PLTR:

$0.89

PS Ratio

POET:

650.75

PLTR:

67.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

POET:

$1.07M

PLTR:

$5.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

POET:

$182.16K

PLTR:

$4.39B

EBITDA (TTM)

POET:

-$59.50M

PLTR:

$2.01B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

POET vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POET
POET Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
POET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POET Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
POET Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
POET Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
POET Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTR
PLTR Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POET vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for POET Technologies Inc (POET) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


POETPLTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.07

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

0.18

+3.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.62

0.33

+6.29

POET vs. PLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POET Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is higher than the PLTR Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POET and PLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


POETPLTRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

0.14

+1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.64

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.86

-0.79

Drawdowns

POET vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POET drawdown since its inception was -93.47%, which is greater than PLTR's maximum drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POET and PLTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


POETPLTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.47%

-84.62%

-8.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.29%

-38.19%

-18.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-85.85%

-40.61%

-45.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.47%

-79.14%

-14.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.30%

-34.13%

-6.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-61.10%

-40.29%

-20.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.30%

20.71%

+8.59%

Volatility

POET vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison

POET Technologies Inc (POET) has a higher volatility of 66.01% compared to Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) at 17.24%. This indicates that POET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


POETPLTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

66.01%

17.24%

+48.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

121.88%

38.35%

+83.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

139.98%

50.93%

+89.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

107.21%

65.44%

+41.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

99.13%

69.81%

+29.32%

Dividends

POET vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison

Neither POET nor PLTR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

POET vs. PLTR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between POET Technologies Inc and Palantir Technologies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
341.20K
1.63B
(POET) Total Revenue
(PLTR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


POET and PLTR have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

POET has higher volatility (66.01%) compared to PLTR (17.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POET dropped -93.47% vs PLTR's -84.62%.

POET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for POET and PLTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer