POCT vs. UXJA

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

POCT (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October) and UXJA (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January) are both Defined Outcome funds. POCT is passively managed, while UXJA is actively managed. Over the past year, POCT returned 12.70% vs 25.34% for UXJA. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. POCT charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for UXJA.

Performance

POCT vs. UXJA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January (UXJA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POCT achieves a 7.29% return, which is significantly lower than UXJA's 14.20% return.

POCT

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 1.18%
• 6M: 7.02%
• YTD: 7.29%
• 1Y: 12.70%
• 3Y*: 11.90%
• 5Y*: 10.05%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.95%

UXJA

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 2.89%
• 6M: 13.48%
• YTD: 14.20%
• 1Y: 25.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October	$2.04M	$2.00M	$3.37M
UXJA FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January	$50.11K	$64.18K	$76.75K

POCT vs. UXJA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October	7.29%	9.94%
UXJA FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January	14.20%	14.47%

Correlation

The correlation between POCT and UXJA is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2025	0.94

The correlation between POCT and UXJA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

POCT vs. UXJA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

POCT

POCT Risk / Return Rank: 82
POCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
POCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
POCT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
POCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
POCT Martin Ratio Rank: 88

UXJA

UXJA Risk / Return Rank: 65
UXJA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
UXJA Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
UXJA Omega Ratio Rank: 61
UXJA Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
UXJA Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

POCT vs. UXJA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January (UXJA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	POCT	UXJA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	1.75	+0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.96	2.41	+0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.30	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.90	2.59	+0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.55	10.21	+4.34

POCT vs. UXJA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POCT Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the UXJA Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POCT and UXJA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

POCT vs. UXJA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POCT drawdown since its inception was -18.80%, smaller than the maximum UXJA drawdown of -20.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POCT and UXJA.

Drawdown Indicators

	POCT	UXJA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.80%	-20.01%	+1.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.40%	-9.83%	+5.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.22%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	-0.11%	+0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.47%	-2.88%	+1.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.87%	2.49%	-1.62%

Volatility

POCT vs. UXJA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) is 1.52%, while FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January (UXJA) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that POCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UXJA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	POCT	UXJA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.52%	4.64%	-3.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.98%	11.35%	-6.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.20%	14.58%	-8.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.00%	18.40%	-10.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.15%	18.40%	-8.25%

POCT vs. UXJA - Expense Ratio Comparison

POCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than UXJA's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

POCT vs. UXJA - Dividend Comparison

Neither POCT nor UXJA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.21%
UXJA FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both POCT and UXJA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, POCT and UXJA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, POCT or UXJA?

UXJA has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to POCT (1.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POCT dropped -18.80% vs UXJA's -20.01%.

Which ETF is better, POCT or UXJA?

On 1-year performance, UXJA leads with 25.34% vs 12.70% for POCT. On fees, POCT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, POCT has been the lower-risk option at 1.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, POCT or UXJA?

Over the 1-year period, UXJA has performed better with a 25.34% return vs 12.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, POCT or UXJA?

POCT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, POCT or UXJA?

POCT and UXJA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between POCT and UXJA?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for POCT and 0.85% for UXJA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

POCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.