POCT vs. LOUP
POCT (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October) and LOUP (Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - POCT is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index, while LOUP is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Deepwater Frontier Tech Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, POCT returned 9.90%/yr vs 13.62%/yr for LOUP. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. POCT charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for LOUP.
Performance
POCT vs. LOUP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POCT achieves a 5.54% return, which is significantly lower than LOUP's 30.66% return.
POCT
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- YTD
- 5.54%
- 6M
- 6.22%
- 1Y
- 15.20%
- 3Y*
- 12.24%
- 5Y*
- 9.90%
- 10Y*
- —
LOUP
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 20.92%
- YTD
- 30.66%
- 6M
- 29.25%
- 1Y
- 81.09%
- 3Y*
- 38.24%
- 5Y*
- 13.62%
- 10Y*
- —
POCT vs. LOUP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October | 5.54% | 11.00% | 9.54% | 20.12% | -1.26% | 9.46% | 10.40% | 12.80% | -7.12% |
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF | 30.66% | 43.24% | 21.80% | 51.31% | -46.00% | 7.54% | 86.25% | 31.76% | -23.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between POCT and LOUP is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2018 | 0.74 |
The correlation between POCT and LOUP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
POCT vs. LOUP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
POCT
LOUP
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
POCT
LOUP
Financial Services
POCT
LOUP
Communication Services
POCT
LOUP
Consumer Cyclical
POCT
LOUP
Healthcare
POCT
LOUP
Industrials
POCT
LOUP
Consumer Defensive
POCT
LOUP
-
Energy
POCT
LOUP
Utilities
POCT
LOUP
Real Estate
POCT
LOUP
-
Basic Materials
POCT
LOUP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POCT vs. LOUP — Risk / Return Rank
POCT
LOUP
POCT vs. LOUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) and Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| POCT | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.48 | 2.87 | -0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.56 | 3.39 | +0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.44 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.53 | 4.02 | -0.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.14 | 13.63 | +4.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| POCT | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48 | 2.87 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.25 | 0.42 | +0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.60 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
POCT vs. LOUP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POCT drawdown since its inception was -18.80%, smaller than the maximum LOUP drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POCT and LOUP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POCT | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.80% | -58.68% | +39.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.40% | -21.00% | +16.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.22% | -35.23% | +25.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.22% | -55.63% | +45.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.50% | -20.05% | +18.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | 6.19% | -5.33% |
Volatility
POCT vs. LOUP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) is 0.92%, while Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) has a volatility of 7.78%. This indicates that POCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LOUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POCT | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.92% | 7.78% | -6.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.78% | 21.85% | -17.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.16% | 28.47% | -22.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.94% | 32.38% | -24.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.23% | 31.97% | -21.74% |
POCT vs. LOUP - Expense Ratio Comparison
POCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than LOUP's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
POCT vs. LOUP - Dividend Comparison
Neither POCT nor LOUP has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
POCT and LOUP have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LOUP has higher volatility (7.78%) compared to POCT (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POCT dropped -18.80% vs LOUP's -58.68%.
On 5-year performance, LOUP leads with 13.62% vs 9.90% for POCT. On fees, LOUP is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, POCT has been the lower-risk option at 0.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LOUP has performed better with a 13.62% return vs 9.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LOUP is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for POCT.
POCT and LOUP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
POCT is categorized as Defined Outcome, while LOUP is Technology Equities. POCT tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index, while LOUP tracks Deepwater Frontier Tech Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for POCT and 0.70% for LOUP.
LOUP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for POCT and LOUP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer